2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-84042004000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composição florística e estrutura do componente arbóreo de uma floresta altimontana no município de Camanducaia, Minas Gerais, Brasil

Abstract: -(Floristic composition and structure of a tree component of a high montane forest in the municipality of Camanducaia, Minas Gerais, Brazil). The floristic composition and phytosociological structure were investigated in an area of 0.75 ha of a montane forest (1,900 m a.s.l.) located between the municipality of Gonçalves and Camanducaia in the Serra da Mantiqueira. This forest belongs to the largest forest remnant in the region, and keep several headwaters of rivers which waters supply many cities in southern … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
27

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
33
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…The families Myrtaceae, Aquifoliaceae, and Lauraceae have also been shown to be highly representative of the structure of upper montane cloud forests in the state of Paraná, Brazil (Scheer et al 2011). In the upper montane cloud forest at Camanducaia, which, like our study area, is at an elevation of 1900 m, França & Stehmann (2004) found that the richest families were Myrtaceae, Solanaceae, Lauraceae, Rubiaceae, Symplocaceae, and Asteraceae. In another study conducted in the Serra da Mantiqueira, Meireles et al (2008) found that, along an elevational gradient ranging from 1820 m to 1940 m, the richest family was Myrtaceae, followed by Asteraceae, Lauraceae, Aquifoliaceae, Melastomataceae, Solanaceae, and Cunoniaceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The families Myrtaceae, Aquifoliaceae, and Lauraceae have also been shown to be highly representative of the structure of upper montane cloud forests in the state of Paraná, Brazil (Scheer et al 2011). In the upper montane cloud forest at Camanducaia, which, like our study area, is at an elevation of 1900 m, França & Stehmann (2004) found that the richest families were Myrtaceae, Solanaceae, Lauraceae, Rubiaceae, Symplocaceae, and Asteraceae. In another study conducted in the Serra da Mantiqueira, Meireles et al (2008) found that, along an elevational gradient ranging from 1820 m to 1940 m, the richest family was Myrtaceae, followed by Asteraceae, Lauraceae, Aquifoliaceae, Melastomataceae, Solanaceae, and Cunoniaceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the upper montane cloud forest at Bocaina de Minas, where the elevation ranges from 1210 m to 1360 m, Carvalho et al (2005) found Melastomataceae and Myrtaceae to be the richest families, followed by Fabaceae, Lauraceae, Annonaceae, Solanaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Asteraceae, Cyatheaceae, and Rubiaceae. Other authors have also identified Myrtaceae as the richest family in montane forests within the Atlantic Forest Biome of Brazil, including other forests in the Serra da Mantiqueira (Pereira et al 2006;França & Stehmann, 2004;Meirelles et al 2008), as well as in other regions of the country, including the south (Scheer et al 2011) and southeast (Oliveira-Filho & Fontes 2000;Costa et al 2011). Conversely, the family Fabaceae was not found in our study area, and its absence at higher elevations has also been noted in other studies (Oliveira-Filho & Fontes, 2000;Gentry 1995;França & Stehmann, 2004;Meireles et al 2008;Scheer et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Romariz (1996) highlighted the physiognomic variations between broadleaved forests and Araucaria forests and stated that there should also be a strong floristic differentiation. According (França & Stehmann 2004). Coastland dwarf forests are characterized by a rather different species composition, with a predominance of Clusia spp., Eugenia spp., Myrcia spp., and Myrsine spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%