2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-33062014000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree species composition in areas of Atlantic Forest in southeastern Brazil is consistent with a new system for classifying the vegetation of South America

Abstract: Rigorous and well-defined criteria for the classification of vegetation constitute a prerequisite for effective biodiversity conservation strategies. In 2009, a new classification system was proposed for vegetation types in extra-Andean tropical and subtropical South America. The new system expanded upon the criteria established in the existing Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics classification system. Here, we attempted to determine whether the tree species composition of the formations within the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, that phenotypic plasticity is strong enough in the region so that species can express distinct habits and trait values across different vegetation types, to a large extent driven by local resource variation [ 43 , 104 ]. Second, although physiognomic variation captures a significant portion of changes in species composition [ 68 ], we should not use vegetation types as proxies for floristic composition because they masks the main biogeographical patterns in plant species distributions. Rather, vegetation types should be used as a classification scheme complimentary to recognized biogeographical sub regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, that phenotypic plasticity is strong enough in the region so that species can express distinct habits and trait values across different vegetation types, to a large extent driven by local resource variation [ 43 , 104 ]. Second, although physiognomic variation captures a significant portion of changes in species composition [ 68 ], we should not use vegetation types as proxies for floristic composition because they masks the main biogeographical patterns in plant species distributions. Rather, vegetation types should be used as a classification scheme complimentary to recognized biogeographical sub regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal structures have been proposed for the Caatinga based on drought severity [ 64 , 66 ], floristic distinctiveness [ 54 , 66 ], and congruence of soil, geomorphology, plant, and animal species [ 67 ]. Eisenlohr & Oliveira-Filho [ 68 ] suggested that a purely physiognomic classification captured most of the floristic variation in large regions and Fernandes [ 66 ] proposed a physiognomic classification as a proxy for floristic variation in the Caatinga. However, these proposals are qualitative [ 64 , 66 , 69 ] or based on subjective expert opinion [ 67 , 69 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we considered the Atlantic Forest sensu latissimo (Oliveira-Filho et al 2006) to include the following five main forest types (MFTs): 'Rain Forest', 'Coastal Sandy Forest', 'Cloud Forest', 'Araucaria Mixed Forest', and 'Semi-deciduous Forest'. These MFTs were primarily chosen and defined based on their physiognomic aspects using a framework adapted from Oliveira-Filho (2009) and validated by Eisenlohr and Oliveira-Filho (2014). Note that the OF&F paper did not distinguish between 'Rain Forest' and 'Coastal Sandy Forest', which were both treated as rain forests, and that the authors adopted the sensu latissimo view, although this specific term had not yet been coined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally, such classification systems and their elevational boundaries are supported by scientific studies, validation of results in the field and experience of researchers involved, as is the case with systems designed for the Brazilian vegetation aforementioned. For example, numerical evidence for the consistency of a classification system was recently obtained by Eisenlohr and Oliveira-Filho (2014). The definition of altitudinal zones in classification systems (Ellenberg and Mueller-Dombois 1967;OliveiraFilho 2009;IBGE 2012) should also guide decision-making process in biodiversity conservation, since these systems can guide the definition of priority areas for conservation, human occupancy and even help shorten the reach of certain anthropogenic impacts (Armenteras et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%