2015
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-736x2015000700011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral fibrosarcoma in jararaca (Bothrops pubescens): anatomopathological and immunohistochemical aspects

Abstract: RESUMO.-[Fibrossarcoma oral em jararaca (Bothrops pubescens): aspectos anatomopatológicos e imuno-histoquímicos.] Uma serpente de cativeiro, fêmea, quatro anos de idade, do gênero Bothrops apresentou aumento de volume no lado esquerdo da cavidade oral, sugerindo tratar--se de neoplasma. A massa foi removida cirurgicamente e enviada para exame anatomopatológico. Dois meses depois foi observado novo aumento de volume no mesmo local, sugerindo recidiva. A lesão foi removida por completo e também enviada para anál… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, as an antihuman antibody was used in this study, the result could have been false-negative [22]. According to previous studies, the negative results could be due to the non-specificity of the antibody [22][23][24][25][26]. Moreover, the positive controls, smooth and striated muscle samples, in this case have demonstrated to be negative to vimentin, meaning non-specificity of the antibody in this reptile species (Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, as an antihuman antibody was used in this study, the result could have been false-negative [22]. According to previous studies, the negative results could be due to the non-specificity of the antibody [22][23][24][25][26]. Moreover, the positive controls, smooth and striated muscle samples, in this case have demonstrated to be negative to vimentin, meaning non-specificity of the antibody in this reptile species (Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, although the tumor originated from smooth muscle cells, it was possible to lack reactivity to vimentin. Second, as an antihuman antibody was used in this study, the result could have been false-negative [22]. According to previous studies, the negative results could be due to the non-specificity of the antibody [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%