2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-55022008000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conhecimento e interesse em ética médica e bioética na graduação médica

Abstract: -Ensino. (4,7 ± 0,7 vs. 4,5 ± 0,8; p = 0,086), enquanto o autoconhecimento sobre o tema foi maior no primeiro grupo (3,4 ± 0,9 vs. 3,2 ± 0,7; p = 0,017 RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar o interesse e o conhecimento sobre ética médica e bioética na graduação médica. Méto-dos: Estudo transversal e descritivo. Foram utilizados dois questionários auto-aplicáveis, um para docen ABSTRACT Objectives: To evaluate the interest and knowledge about Medical Ethics and Bioethics in medical graduation. Methods: Transversal an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
30

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
11
0
30
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the third block shown in the questionnaire to the medical faculty, which directly assessed their knowledge regarding the CEM articles (Appendix II), results obtained were similar to those from other studies using the same instrument [13][14][15][16][17][18] . The questions that received correct answers similar to the ones in these surveys were those dealing with general topics, such as doctor-patient relationships, confidentiality, AIDS, human cloning, and illegible handwriting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the third block shown in the questionnaire to the medical faculty, which directly assessed their knowledge regarding the CEM articles (Appendix II), results obtained were similar to those from other studies using the same instrument [13][14][15][16][17][18] . The questions that received correct answers similar to the ones in these surveys were those dealing with general topics, such as doctor-patient relationships, confidentiality, AIDS, human cloning, and illegible handwriting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The latter, created and validated by Almeida et al 13 , is self-administered for lecturers, with multiple choice questions, and is divided into three blocks of questions: 1) characterization of the respondent (respecting anonymity); 2) perception of teaching of medical ethics; 3) evaluation of knowledge of the Code of Medical Ethics. As this questionnaire was originally applied and validated in a medical course with traditional teaching methods, it was decided to make some adjustments, especially regarding the terminologies specific to a medical course based on active learning methodologies, as it is the case of the PUC-Goiás course, in which, for example, there are not disciplines, but units.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first question reveals that 50% (n = 9) read the complete Código de Ética e Deontologia da Fisioterapia -CEDF -(Physiotherapy Code of Ethics and Deontology) 6 , a result which did not corroborate the research of Vieira and Neves 7 and Almeida et al 8 , in which medical educators claim to have partially read the code of ethics of their profession: 62% (n = 75) and 86.2% (n = 87), respectively. Noteworthy is the fact that if we add the number of educators who partially read the code and those who have never read it, it would amount to the same quantity of lecturers who fully read the code 50% (n = 9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Tal perspectiva foi assinalada em 1985 em um relatório da Comissão de Ensino Médico do Conselho Federal de Medicina e reforçada em estudos posteriores [7][8][9][10][11] . De forma geral, observa-se que todos esses estudos orientam que o perí-odo ideal para o início do ensino da ética no curso de Medicina seria o ciclo pré-clínico, se prolongando por toda a graduação.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified