Desenvolvimento de genótipos de mamoeiro tolerantes à mancha fisiológica

Pinto, Fernanda; Ramos, Helaine Christine Cancela; Cardoso, Deisy Lúcia; Luz, Lucas Nunes da; Pereira, Messias Gonzaga

doi:10.1590/s0100-29452013000400022

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(18 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Golden cultivar was grouped with the genotypes with lower PP and FW in the two harvest seasons. This reinforces the results obtained by Pinto et al (2013aPinto et al ( , 2013b, who observed the degeneration of the Golden cultivar due to the indiscriminate production of seeds, which causes the loss of its original characteristics.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

“…These values were higher than those reported by Oliveira et al (2010) and Reis et al (2015). However, when considering characteristics of great phenotypic variation, the CV values were acceptable for papaya (Pinto et al, 2013a(Pinto et al, , 2013b and allowed identifying differences between treatments.…”

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 58%

“…In summer, the hybrids developed by Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro in partnership with Caliman Agrícola S/A (Uenf/Caliman), as well as the 'L 47-P8', 'L 54-08', and 'Golden', stood out because they had °Brix values between 14.30 ('UC 16') and 15.05 ('L 47-P8'). These values were high compared with those obtained by Pinto et al (2013b) -between 9.3 and 11 °Brix, above the acceptable value by the fruit market for the Solo group, of approximately 11.5 °Brix (Fagundes & Yamanishi, 2001).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 49%

“…However, the reduced number of available cultivars, the incidence of diseases, and the effect of climatic conditions on fruit development compromise the continuous growth in productivity (Moretti et al, 2010;Pinto et al, 2013b).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Productivity and quality of Formosa and Solo papaya over two harvest seasons

Barros

Kuhlcamp

Arantes

et al. 2017

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-The objective of this work was to evaluate the productivity and quality of papaya fruits (Carica papaya) of the Solo (12 genotypes) and Formosa (9 genotypes) heterotic groups over two harvest seasons. The experiment was conducted under field conditions in the municipality of Pinheiros, in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, in a randomized complete block design. Ten morpho-agronomic and physicochemical variables of the fruits were measured in winter (210-300 days after planting) and summer (450-540 days after planting). The data were subjected to the combined analysis of variance, to the breakdown of the genotype x environment interactions, and to the grouping of means by the Scott-Knott test. Although harvest season affected the evaluated characteristics, it did not alter the classification of the genotype. In the Solo group, the H 36-45 and UC 15 hybrids stand out due to their greater productivity, fruit weight, and soluble solids contents. In the Formosa group, the Rubi Incaper 511 cultivar shows greater productivity, higher number of commercial fruits, and lower number of deformed fruits over both evaluated harvest seasons.Index terms: Carica papaya, agronomic performance, environmental effect, genotype evaluation. Produtividade e qualidade de frutos de mamão Formosa e Solo em duas épocas de colheitaResumo -O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a produtividade e a qualidade de frutos de mamoeiro (Carica papaya) dos grupos heteróticos Solo (12 genótipos) e Formosa (9 genótipos), em duas épocas de colheita. O experimento foi conduzido em condições de campo em Pinheiros, ES, em delineamento de blocos ao acaso. Dez variáveis morfoagronômicas e físico-químicas dos frutos foram avaliadas no inverno (210 a 300 dias após o plantio) e no verão (450 a 540 dias após o plantio). Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância conjunta, à decomposição da interação genótipo x ambiente e ao agrupamento das médias pelo teste de Scott-Knott. Embora a colheita em diferentes épocas tenha influenciado as características avaliadas, não alterou a classificação dos genótipos. No grupo Solo, destacam-se os híbridos H 36-45 e UC 15, por suas maiores produção e massa do fruto e por seu alto teor de sólidos solúveis. No grupo Formosa, a cultivar Rubi Incaper 511 apresenta maior produção, maior número de frutos comerciais e menor número de frutos deformados nas duas épocas de colheita avaliadas.Termos para indexação: Carica papaya, desempenho agronômico, efeito ambiental, avaliação de genótipos.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 58%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 49%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Productivity and quality of Formosa and Solo papaya over two harvest seasons

Barros

Kuhlcamp

Arantes

et al. 2017

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Luz et al (2015) também observaram valores de CV e semelhantes para estas mesmas características. Em estudos realizados com a cultura do mamoeiro foram observadas estimativas de CV e de baixo a muito alto (OLIVEIRA et al, 2010(OLIVEIRA et al, , 2014PINTO et al, 2013aPINTO et al, , 2013bSILVA et al, 2008aSILVA et al, , 2008b.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Combining ability of recombinant lines of papaya from backcrossing for sexual conversion

Barros

Arêdes

Ramos

et al. 2017

Revista Ciência Agronômica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sensory acceptance and qualitative analysis of fruits in papaya hybrids

Luz

Vettorazzi

Santa-Catarina

et al. 2018

An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last three years, Brazil has been ranked among the three largest producers of papaya. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptance and commercial standard of papaya fruits according to their sensory traits and provide information about the organoleptic and qualitative aspects of the fruit. Ten papaya genotypes grown in Linhares-ES were investigated, arranged in a randomized block design with four replications. Ten fruits from each genotype were randomly collected from each replication, which totaled 40 fruits per genotype. The fruit harvest was performed at stage 1 of maturation. The following genotypes were assessed: hybrids UC13, UC14, UC15 and UC16, from the 'Solo' group; hybrids UC03, UC10 and UC12, from the 'Formosa' group; and 'Golden', 'Calimosa' and 'Tainung 01', which were used as controls. The sensory evaluation of the genotypes was carried out in full balanced design by 50 evaluators. When submitted to sensory analysis, the hybrids showed high performance compared to the controls of each group. Traits such as aroma, flavor and overall impression were crucial in the selection carried out by the appraisers of the hybrids assessed. The hybrids UC10, UC12, UC14 and UC16 were the most accepted and preferred, respectively, in purchase intention. An Acad Bras Cienc (2018) 90 (4) 3694 LUCAS N. DA LUZ et al. SENSORY ACCEPTANCE IN PAPAYA FRUITS 3695

show abstract

Desenvolvimento de genótipos de mamoeiro tolerantes à mancha fisiológica

Cited by 6 publications

References 19 publications

Productivity and quality of Formosa and Solo papaya over two harvest seasons

Productivity and quality of Formosa and Solo papaya over two harvest seasons

Combining ability of recombinant lines of papaya from backcrossing for sexual conversion

Sensory acceptance and qualitative analysis of fruits in papaya hybrids

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About