2018
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2018000800008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of the AquaCrop parameters for rainfed corn in the South of Brazil

Abstract: The objective of this work was to perform a sensitivity analysis of the main input parameters required for the AquaCrop water balance model, using biomass and grain yield data of a rainfed-simulated corn crop, obtained along the climate data series of 1987-2016 in the South of Brazil. The levels of soil-water stress and the depths of maximum effective rooting were the input parameters that most affected the biomass and grain yields simulated by the model, followed by the crop coefficient, water-use efficiency,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A.; Silva, G. Í. N.; Silva, T. G. F. Quando comparado a outros modelos de simulação, o AquaCrop necessita de um número reduzido de variáveis e parâmetros de entrada, os quais são facilmente computados. Apesar das características de simplicidade do modelo, quando bem calibrado e validado, o mesmo oferece um grande equilíbrio na precisão da produção (Martini, 2018;Steduto et al, 2007;Vanuytrecht et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2019).…”
Section: = X Y B Hiunclassified
“…A.; Silva, G. Í. N.; Silva, T. G. F. Quando comparado a outros modelos de simulação, o AquaCrop necessita de um número reduzido de variáveis e parâmetros de entrada, os quais são facilmente computados. Apesar das características de simplicidade do modelo, quando bem calibrado e validado, o mesmo oferece um grande equilíbrio na precisão da produção (Martini, 2018;Steduto et al, 2007;Vanuytrecht et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2019).…”
Section: = X Y B Hiunclassified
“…From these results, it can be seen that both measured data and AquaCrop simulation show no significant difference between the two sowing rates. For rainfed corn, Martini [35] showed that AquaCrop is less sensitive to crop management factors such as planting density. Figure 13.…”
Section: Effect Of Sowing Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They estimated the yields in these seasons based on the irrigation volume, where they showed that irrigating maize with 72.15 mm of water in the rainy season could increase the yield by 0.24 t/ha and irrigating with 427.03 mm in the dry season could increase the yield by 1.22 t/ha [13]. Martini (2018) simulated rainfed maize yields using climate data from 1987 to 2016 in southern Brazil and analyzed the sensitivity of parameters such as the soil water stress level, maximum effective rooting depth, root zone crop coefficient, groundwater recharge, and planting density, which are required by the AquaCrop model. The results show that the crop cycle duration, planting density, and field practices had minimal effects, whereas the root zone crop coefficient, WUE, soil water storage, and groundwater recharge were the parameters with the greatest effects on rainfed maize yields [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martini (2018) simulated rainfed maize yields using climate data from 1987 to 2016 in southern Brazil and analyzed the sensitivity of parameters such as the soil water stress level, maximum effective rooting depth, root zone crop coefficient, groundwater recharge, and planting density, which are required by the AquaCrop model. The results show that the crop cycle duration, planting density, and field practices had minimal effects, whereas the root zone crop coefficient, WUE, soil water storage, and groundwater recharge were the parameters with the greatest effects on rainfed maize yields [14]. In addition, in order to improve the effectiveness of the model, ACOSP is an open-source Python implementation of AquaCrop developed by Kelly and Foster, which can be implemented for integration with other Python modules [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%