2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2013000600003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cophenetic correlation coefficient for Tocher's method

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to propose a way of using the Tocher's method of clustering to obtain a matrix similar to the cophenetic one obtained for hierarchical methods, which would allow the calculation of a cophenetic correlation. To illustrate the obtention of the proposed cophenetic matrix, we used two dissimilarity matrices -one obtained with the generalized squared Mahalanobis distance and the other with the Euclidean distance -between 17 garlic cultivars, based on six morphological characters. Bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the squared Mahalanobis distance (D2ii'), the 29 genotypes were grouped into four clusters, either by the Tocher optimization method (Table 6) or the UPGMA method (Figure 1). This equivalence in clustering genotypes by the methods is an evidence of a high consistency in the results, also supported by the high estimates of the cophenetic correlation coefficient (Tocher's method: 0.83; UPGMA: 0.72), both significant (p < 0.001) by (Silva & Dias 2013). These results indicate that there is a high genetic divergence between some of the genotypes assessed, because, although the great majority of the genotypes are grouped with less than 50 units of distance (e.g., clusters I), the clusters diverged from each other in distances of about 100 units or more.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Using the squared Mahalanobis distance (D2ii'), the 29 genotypes were grouped into four clusters, either by the Tocher optimization method (Table 6) or the UPGMA method (Figure 1). This equivalence in clustering genotypes by the methods is an evidence of a high consistency in the results, also supported by the high estimates of the cophenetic correlation coefficient (Tocher's method: 0.83; UPGMA: 0.72), both significant (p < 0.001) by (Silva & Dias 2013). These results indicate that there is a high genetic divergence between some of the genotypes assessed, because, although the great majority of the genotypes are grouped with less than 50 units of distance (e.g., clusters I), the clusters diverged from each other in distances of about 100 units or more.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The representation of the matrix by the dendrogram (Fig 3) also showed a high co-optic correlation, which shows high agreement in the grouping performed and the dissimilarity matrix [24]. This reinforces the reliability of subsequent crossing to be established based on the composition of the clusters using the RNAs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The cophenetic matrix of the Tocher's method was obtained using the methodology developed by Silva and Dias (2013), who propose to acquire a matrix similar to the cophenetic one from the hierarchical methods, through the intra and intergroup average distances. The cophenetic correlation coefficients were obtained from the original distances and cophenetic matrices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%