2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2007000400020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stomatal conductance of maize under water and nitrogen deficits

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of drought and nitrogen (N) stresses on stomatal conductance of three maize cultivars grown in the field. The stomatal conductance of Sol da Manhã variety (BRS 4157) and Pioneer 6875 hybrid, under drought and high N, was lower than under drought and low N, which indicates drought tolerance, since these cultivars did not exhibit reduction in grain yield by drought, as observed for Amarelão variety, which flowered under more severe drought. 'Sol da Manhã' ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maize responds well to different management practices, among which irrigation and nitrogen fertilization contribute significantly to maximum crop productivity, and irrigation may improve the efficiency of fertilizer utilization (Abbas et al, ). As reported by Medici et al (), when plants flowered early during drought, high N supply did mitigate the drought effect. Medici et al () emphasized a gap between research on deficit irrigation and research on well‐watered plants.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Maize responds well to different management practices, among which irrigation and nitrogen fertilization contribute significantly to maximum crop productivity, and irrigation may improve the efficiency of fertilizer utilization (Abbas et al, ). As reported by Medici et al (), when plants flowered early during drought, high N supply did mitigate the drought effect. Medici et al () emphasized a gap between research on deficit irrigation and research on well‐watered plants.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, for well‐watered pot‐grown Coffea canephora , N application increased δ 13 C through changes in carbon assimilation with little or no effect on stomatal behaviour (DaMatta et al , 2002). Moreover, other studies show that under full irrigation, an increase in N fertiliser did not decrease stomatal conductance (Medici et al , 2007) although it reduced C i / C a (Cechin & Fumis, 2004). Our results do not allow us to ascribe the slight increase we found in δ 13 C to water stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The decrease in photosynthesis under limited water may be due to degradation of chlorophyll, disintegration and suppression of rubisco and stomatal closure (Hajduch et al, 2001;Pietrini et al, 2003). Stomatal regulation is a vital phenomenon in plants, because it prevents both desiccation and CO 2 acquisition (Dodd, 2003;Medici et al, 2007). Closing of stomata under limited water attributed to (Maroco et al, 1997;Chaves et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%