2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832001000300019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variabilidade espacial de atributos físicos em um Latossolo Vermelho distrófico sob semeadura direta em Selvíria (MS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
10
2
51

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
10
2
51
Order By: Relevance
“…in the subsurface (Ma2, Ma3), lognormal distribution was observed, with increased soil compaction in the second and third layers, in agreement with Souza et al (2001), Carvalho et al (2002) and Melo Filho et al (2006. in conservation tillage systems, the action of roots, macro and micro-organisms promoted a good macropore volume, and the mulch of crop residues on the surface retained soil moisture (lima et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in the subsurface (Ma2, Ma3), lognormal distribution was observed, with increased soil compaction in the second and third layers, in agreement with Souza et al (2001), Carvalho et al (2002) and Melo Filho et al (2006. in conservation tillage systems, the action of roots, macro and micro-organisms promoted a good macropore volume, and the mulch of crop residues on the surface retained soil moisture (lima et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…thus, the distribution of density values was not logical as they did not increase in the deeper layers, in disagreement with Souza et al (2001), Carvalho et al (2002) and Melo Filho et al (2006. therefore, this fact may have contributed to a reduction of FdM, which did not reach, despite the use of irrigation, the full expression of the yield capacity of the maize hybrid p30F80.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…There were no differences among soil tillage, nutrient sources, and interaction between nutrient sources and soil tillage or layer. The coefficient of variation was below 10 % for most parameters, except for macroporosity, which is affected by the higher variability usually found in larger pores (Souza et al, 2001). In view of the interaction between layers and soil tillage, the Tukey test was performed comparing means for soil tillage within each layer on the one and comparing means for soil layer within each soil tillage system on the other hand (Table 1).…”
Section: Long-term Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A presença de maior valor de CV para U 1 (44,6%) pode ser justificada, considerando que no dia anterior à amostragem ocorreu chuva de 38 mm que pode ter contribuído para aumentar a heterogeneidade natural deste atributo na área de estudo, principalmente na profundidade de 0,0-0,1m. Siqueira et al (2008) (Souza et al, 2001;Carvalho et al, 2002b;Dossa et al, 2002;Santos et al, 2005;Veronese Junior et al, 2006). Já em RP 1 , RP 3 , RP M e UG 1 a distribuição de frequência é do tipo lognormal, enquanto a da RP 2 tendeu a lognormal e a UG 2 tendeu a normal.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…O modelo esférico se ajustou apenas para os semivariogramas do perímetro na altura do peito (PAP), discordando de outros autores que descrevem este modelo como o que mais se ajusta aos atributos de solo e planta (Souza et al, 2001;Siqueira et al, 2008). Os semivariogramas da altura das árvores (ALT), do volume de madeira (VOL), e da resistência do solo à penetração de 0,0-0,1 m de profundidade (RP 1 ) e de 0,2-0,3 m de profundidade (RP 3 ) se ajustaram ao modelo exponencial.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified