2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832000000100022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propriedades químicas e biológicas de solo de tabuleiro cultivado com cana-de-açúcar com e sem queima da palhada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
14
0
40

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
5
14
0
40
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, other properties (88 %) differed between treatments, indicating that at a higher organic carbon content, the soil will be better structured, retain more moisture, with consequent reduction in PR (as in the case of TM) and develop the sugarcane root system better. This result is extremely important, since it confirms the relevance of leaving the sugarcane trash on the soil, as also reported by Mendonza et al (2000), who described the benefits of this practice. When comparing data, it was observed that 90 % of the properties were statistically significant by the F test, proving that treatment TM performed best from the point of view of soil conservation for the studied soil properties, the treatment had a direct impact on sugarcane performance, i.e., higher yields resulting in higher profit for the sugarcane growers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, other properties (88 %) differed between treatments, indicating that at a higher organic carbon content, the soil will be better structured, retain more moisture, with consequent reduction in PR (as in the case of TM) and develop the sugarcane root system better. This result is extremely important, since it confirms the relevance of leaving the sugarcane trash on the soil, as also reported by Mendonza et al (2000), who described the benefits of this practice. When comparing data, it was observed that 90 % of the properties were statistically significant by the F test, proving that treatment TM performed best from the point of view of soil conservation for the studied soil properties, the treatment had a direct impact on sugarcane performance, i.e., higher yields resulting in higher profit for the sugarcane growers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It was observed that YLD (TM) was 11.4 % higher than in TR, and STD was 9.5 % higher. This behavior was due to the residues of the previous crop left in the area, increasing the levels of soil organic matter, compared with the initial analysis (August/2010), which is extremely relevant for the soil physical, chemical and biological properties as well as for sugarcane (Mendonza et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the same experimental site, Mendoza et al (2000) observed that in the 0.0-0.05 m layer, the maintenance of the residue on soil surface increased the levels of HU-C and FA-C; this was also corroborated by Canellas et al (2003) in areas with and without residue burning over a long period of time and with vinasse application. The MT management of sugarcane areas in the coastal tableland soils provides greater protection and/ or increased C in humic substance fractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In systems where the residue is not burned, an increase in P available is not expected because the sugarcane residue has a high C:P ratio and there is a relatively low amount of this element. Mendoza et al (2000) also reported greater availability of Mg 2+ and TOC in the unburned sugarcane plots. In Paraguaçu Paulista -SP, in a Dystrophic Red Latosol (Oxisol), Souza et al (2012) reported higher values of pH, TOC, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , K + and lower values of Al 3+ and H+Al in the area with the unburned sugarcane compared to the burned cane and native forest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation