1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761999000700057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and confirmation in Chagas disease serology - a contribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The serologic diagnosis of Chagas' disease remains problematic, although various kits available show a high degree of precision (1,4,10). Differences in the developmental stage of the parasite and in the procedures used for extraction and purification of antigenic components, as well as in the assay protocol itself, present a permanent source variation for the final product, leading to difficulties in the industrial production of reproducible lots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The serologic diagnosis of Chagas' disease remains problematic, although various kits available show a high degree of precision (1,4,10). Differences in the developmental stage of the parasite and in the procedures used for extraction and purification of antigenic components, as well as in the assay protocol itself, present a permanent source variation for the final product, leading to difficulties in the industrial production of reproducible lots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of the techniques of molecular biology, various proteins were isolated and sequenced, and their corresponding genes were cloned and subsequently used to produce recombinant proteins. Their applicability in diagnosis as well as in our understanding of the host-parasite interactions leading to new ways of vaccine development has been widely reported (7,9,10,11,14,16). Among the synthetic peptides that have been evaluated, TcD and PEP2 are outstanding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…INNO-LIA Chagas (Innogenetics N.V., Ghent, Belgium) is a commercially available immunoblot assay consisting of seven recombinant and synthetic antigens: CRA, FRA, Tc-24, SAPA, MAP, TcD and Ag39, which are coated at separate locations onto a single nylon membrane strip. While offering high diagnostic performance, results can be difficult to interpret, and this platform remains expensive [28][29][30][31]. Until 2015 and 2017, respectively, HBK 740 Immunoblot Linhas anti-T. cruzi and TESA-blot were routinely used for confirmatory testing [32]; however, commercial productions have since been discontinued, leaving a gap in the performance of confirmatory chronic CD diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excepto los liofilizados de plasma y los hemoderivados, todos los componentes de la sangre son infectantes (5)(6)(7). Se estima que el riesgo de adquirir la enfermedad de Chagas al recibir una unidad infectada oscila entre 20% y 40%, cifras que pueden incrementarse, entre otras causas, por la elevada prevalencia en la población, por el largo tiempo de latencia de la infección, que para el caso de Chagas puede ser de varios años, la elevada prevalencia en donantes de sangre, la baja cobertura del tamizaje de las unidades de sangre donadas, el número de unidades de sangre transfundidas, la larga supervivencia del parásito en las unidades de sangre almacenadas en refrigeración, la falta de canalización y confirmación de donantes reactivos sospechosos de estar infectados, y la deficiencia en los controles de calidad durante el procesamiento de la sangre y sus componentes (8,9). Sin embargo, la seguridad de las transfusiones sanguíneas en el país ha mejorado considerablemente en los últimos años, debido a la implementación de estrategias como las siguientes: 1) la obligatoriedad del tamizaje para anti-T.cruzi en todas las unidades de sangre para transfusión desde 1995; 2) la inclusión en la encuesta de selección del donante de preguntas relacionadas con el posible contacto que tenga el individuo con la enfermedad o con el vector, por ejemplo: "¿Conoce o ha sido picado por un insecto llamado pito, chupasangre, tábano, chipo, rondador, vinchuco o chinche besador o picudo?…”
unclassified