1916
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761916000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixação de complemento na blastomicose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1916, Moses [1] was the first to use P. brasiliensis antigens for serologic testing, using a saline extract from the fungus, for successful testing in CF. Since this study, a number of different techniques for the use and preparation of antigens have been described.…”
Section: Antigen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1916, Moses [1] was the first to use P. brasiliensis antigens for serologic testing, using a saline extract from the fungus, for successful testing in CF. Since this study, a number of different techniques for the use and preparation of antigens have been described.…”
Section: Antigen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of the serological response has long been used in PCM with two main purposes. Since its introduction by Moses in 1916 [3], it has been used mainly as a diagnostic tool, because in a significant proportion of the patients it is difficult to obtain clinical specimens to visualise or cultivate the fungus, or both, because only deep-sited lesions are present. Also, it has been used to follow up patients under treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several serological tests for detection of anti-P. brasiliensis antibodies, such as complement fixation (14), double immunodiffusion (DID) (6), counterimmunoelectrophoresis (8), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (11), and dot blot analysis (11,21), can be used in the diagnosis of PCM. However, none of these has the characteristics of high sensitivity and specificity needed for an accurate diagnosis (1,8,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%