Geographical patterns of proportionate mortality for the most common causes of death in Brazil

Abstract

SICHIERI, R. et al. Geographical patterns of proportionate mortality for the most common causes of death in Brazil. Rev. Saúde públ, S.Paulo, 26:424-30,1992. Mortality due to chronic diseases has been increasing in all regions of Brazil with corresponding decreases in mortality from infectious diseases. The geographical variation in proportionate mortality for chronic diseases for 17 Brazilian state capitals for the year 1985 and their association with socio-economic variables and infectious disease was studied. Calculations were made of correlation coefficients of proportionate mortality for adults of 30 years or above due to ischaemic heart disease, stroke and cancer of the lung, the breast and stomach with 3 socio-economic variables, race, and mortality due to infectious disease. Linear regression analysis included as independent variables the % of illiteracy, % of whites, % of houses with piped water, mean income, age group, sex, and % of deaths caused by infectious disease. The dependent variables were the % of deaths due to each one of the chronic diseases studied by age-sex group. Chronic diseases were an important cause of death in all regions of Brazil. Ischaemic heart diseases, stroke and malignant neoplasms accounted for more than 34% of the mortality in each of the 17 capitals studied. Proportionate cause-specific mortality varied markedly among state capitals. Ranges were 6.3-19.5% for ischaemic heart diseases, 8.3-25.4% for stroke, 2.3-10.4% for infections and 12.2-21.5% for malignant neoplasm. Infectious disease mortality had the highest (p < 0.001) correlation with all the four socio-economic variables studied and ischaemic heart disease showed the second highest correlation (p < 0.05). Higher socio-economic level was related to a lower % of infectious diseases and a higher % of ischaemic heart diseases. Mortality due to breast cancer and stroke was not associated with socio-economic variables. Multivariate linear regression models explained 59% of the variance among state capitals for mortality due to ischaemic heart disease, 50% for stroke, 28% for lung cancer, 24% for breast cancer and 40% for stomach cancer. There were major differences in the proportionate mortality due to chronic diseases among the capitals which could not be accounted for by the social and environmental factors and by the mortality due to infectious disease.

Geographic correlation between deprivation and risk of meningococcal disease: an ecological study

“…This has been discussed at historical[7], global[8], and national[9] levels, but new geomapping techniques have shown that it holds true when comparing small areas such as postal or electoral districts. The environmental and social factors conferred upon an individual through their residence in a particular area may be as important as the individual 'risk factors' where communicable disease is concerned[10].…”

Diet and mortality from common cancers in Brazil: an ecological study

“…A possible powerful confounder in this study is the economical diversity among the cities studied. However, in a previous paper we showed that the high variation in cancer among 19 state capitals in Brazil could only be partially related to socioeconomic factors (Sichieri et al, 1992).…”

Occupational pesticide exposure and the risk of death in patients with Parkinson’s disease: an observational study in Southern Brazil.

“…Low educational attainment has been consistently linked to increased risk of death, with a recent study suggesting the effect on mortality may be comparable to smoking [18,19]. Similarly poverty is a well-cited risk factor for chronic disease and premature mortality both in Brazil and across the globe [20,21]. When specifically comparing socioeconomic status and PD mortality, Yang et al found that low-income was associated to higher mortality rates while Beard et al identified higher rates in the high-income population [22,23].…”