2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-72802010000600008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfil clínico e epidemiológico de recém-natos prematuros com muito baixo peso no Rio de Janeiro: estudo de 152 pacientes

Abstract: RESUMOObjetivo: Determinar a prevalência, frequência e distribuição dos estágios evolutivos da retinopatia da prematuridade (ROP) realizado num hospital de nível terciário no Rio de Janeiro. Identificar fatores de risco sistêmicos associados ao seu aparecimento e progressão, descrever o tratamento instituído e evolução dos pacientes. Métodos: Estudo observacional de coorte, entre março de 2005 e fevereiro de 2007. Foram examinados 152 recém-natos(RN) prematuros com 32 semanas ou menos de idade gestacional(IG),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Portes et al (16) 151 Observational cohort study Schumann et al (17) 73 Retrospective cross-sectional study Shinsato et al (18) 70 Prospective study Tomé et al (19) 148 Retrospective cross-sectional observational study Almeida et al (20) 33 Retrospective cohort study Vieira et al (21) 267 Retrospective study Fortes Filho et al (22) 157 Prospective cohort study Gonçalves et al (23) 110 Longitudinal study Jorge et al (24) 232 Prospective cohort study Moinho et al (25) 343 Observational case-control study Silva et al (26) 172 Retrospective, analytical, case-control study Theis et al (27) 320 Cross-sectional and retrospective study Freitas (28) 602 Retrospective cohort study Horewicz et al (29) 183 Quantitative research approach with descriptive crosssectional design Martins (30) 280 Observational epidemiological study with case control design Pereira et al (31) 296 Retrospective cross-sectional study Fonseca et al (32) 323 Cohort study Lamy-Filho. (33) 1.961 Retrospective cohort study Malheiro et al (34) 375 Retrospective study Okamoto et al (35) 58 Cohort study Pastro et al (36) 181 Retrospective cohort study Xavier et al (37) 119 Cross-sectional, retrospective study Cagliari et al (38) 322 Retrospective study…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Portes et al (16) 151 Observational cohort study Schumann et al (17) 73 Retrospective cross-sectional study Shinsato et al (18) 70 Prospective study Tomé et al (19) 148 Retrospective cross-sectional observational study Almeida et al (20) 33 Retrospective cohort study Vieira et al (21) 267 Retrospective study Fortes Filho et al (22) 157 Prospective cohort study Gonçalves et al (23) 110 Longitudinal study Jorge et al (24) 232 Prospective cohort study Moinho et al (25) 343 Observational case-control study Silva et al (26) 172 Retrospective, analytical, case-control study Theis et al (27) 320 Cross-sectional and retrospective study Freitas (28) 602 Retrospective cohort study Horewicz et al (29) 183 Quantitative research approach with descriptive crosssectional design Martins (30) 280 Observational epidemiological study with case control design Pereira et al (31) 296 Retrospective cross-sectional study Fonseca et al (32) 323 Cohort study Lamy-Filho. (33) 1.961 Retrospective cohort study Malheiro et al (34) 375 Retrospective study Okamoto et al (35) 58 Cohort study Pastro et al (36) 181 Retrospective cohort study Xavier et al (37) 119 Cross-sectional, retrospective study Cagliari et al (38) 322 Retrospective study…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(31,32) All articles addressed stages 1 and 3 ROP and only one article (22) did not include stage 2 ROP. As to stages 4 and 5, NBs with stage 4 ROP were investigated in ten articles (40%) (16,21,22,24,25,27,30,32,34,38) and NBs with stage 5 ROP in eight articles (32%). (16,21,22,27,30,31,32,38) With regard to the number of eyes analyzed and classified according to ROP severity, 4,698 did not have ROP, 820 had stage 1 disease and 404 had stage 2 disease (68.1%, 11.9% and 5.8% respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent data published in the city of Joinville(SC) (8) and in the city of São Paulo (16) showed an overall prevalence of ROP of 20 and 29.90%, respectively. In another study in Rio de Janeiro, Portes et al described a prevalence of ROP of 27.81% at Hospital Federal de Bonsucesso (17) . This study showed that the majority of NBs was diagnosed in stage 1 disease (17.81%), and only 9 NBs were diagnosed in stage 5 (2.81%), in which there is total retinal detachment; a similar result is found in the literature (7,10,17) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In another study in Rio de Janeiro, Portes et al described a prevalence of ROP of 27.81% at Hospital Federal de Bonsucesso (17) . This study showed that the majority of NBs was diagnosed in stage 1 disease (17.81%), and only 9 NBs were diagnosed in stage 5 (2.81%), in which there is total retinal detachment; a similar result is found in the literature (7,10,17) . Only 1 patient was recorded with staging ROP 2, born with more than 37 weeks of gestational age, and stage 4B of ROP was not found in any NB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%