2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-71672011000500023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Políticas públicas e direitos dos usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde com diabetes mellitus

Abstract: 952Rev Bras Enferm, Brasília 2011 set-out; 64 (5) RESUMO Este estudo aborda a relação entre políticas públicas e direitos dos usuários com diabetes mellitus quanto aos insumos utilizados no tratamento da doença, sob o ponto de vista das normas e procedimentos legais de amparo a essa população. Preconizase que os profi ssionais de saúde devem constituir um elo entre os usuários e o atual modelo de saúde vigente, assumindo ativamente um papel de defesa dos direitos dos usuários com diabetes mellitus do sistema ú… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in mortality from endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases following PNAISM implementation, as shown in this study, as well as in mortality from circulatory system diseases, may be associated with a reduction in shared risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, 26 and with the health care provided to (Brazilian) diabetic patients, by making available pharmacological treatments (oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin) to them through SUS. 26 The mortality analysis of neoplasms as a whole and not as separate entities, some of which top the priority list of women's health care in PNAISM, particularly cervical and breast cancers, is a limitation of the present study. However, PNAISM should reduce morbidity and mortality due to neoplasms in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The reduction in mortality from endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases following PNAISM implementation, as shown in this study, as well as in mortality from circulatory system diseases, may be associated with a reduction in shared risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, 26 and with the health care provided to (Brazilian) diabetic patients, by making available pharmacological treatments (oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin) to them through SUS. 26 The mortality analysis of neoplasms as a whole and not as separate entities, some of which top the priority list of women's health care in PNAISM, particularly cervical and breast cancers, is a limitation of the present study. However, PNAISM should reduce morbidity and mortality due to neoplasms in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The reduction in mortality from endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases following PNAISM implementation, as shown in this study, as well as in mortality from circulatory system diseases, may be associated with a reduction in shared risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, 35 and with the health care provided to (Brazilian) diabetic patients, by making available pharmacological treatments (oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin) to them through SUS. 35 The mortality analysis of neoplasms as a whole and not as separate entities, some of which top the priority list of women's health care in PNAISM, particularly cervical and breast cancers, is a limitation of the present study. However, PNAISM should reduce morbidity and mortality due to neoplasms in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although all lawsuits have an impact on public health policies, in this study the qualitative phase was initiated in cases involving exclusively diabetes mellitus, since it is a disease with important advances and achievements in the last twenty five years in Brazil 9 , involving medicines and monitoring freely available by the public sector to all patients with the disease. Precisely for this reason access to treatment, hypothetically, should not be subject to judicial decisions.…”
Section: Comunicação Saúde Educação 2018; 22(64):165-76mentioning
confidence: 99%