Elaboração e validação do instrumento de entrevista de enfermagem

Necessidades em saúde e atenção básica: validação de instrumentos de captação

“…The expert analysis method demonstrated its usefulness to elaborate and improve the instruments aimed at getting to know health services' characteristics, practices and tools health professionals use to recognize the population's health needs, strengthening the findings of different other studies (12)(13)(14)(15)(16) .…”

Proposal and content validation of an orofacial myofunctional assessment protocol for individuals with cleft lip and palate

“…According to some authors, as the examiners did not mark the "no clarity" and "unclear" options, there was no need to exclude or reformulate any item (18) . The proposal was adequate and the content of the instrument was validated in a single step, with a percentage of agreement above that established in the literature to be considered valid (13,17,18,29) . Thus, the content of the instrument proposed in this study was considered to be a valid and accurate measure for the 13 items evaluated, as well as their subitems.…”

“…Some aspects concerning the general orofacial myofunctional assessment, such as mobility, muscular tonus, chewing and swallowing, were not anticipated, as it is believed that such assessments do not differ from those applied in other cases and thus other available assessment tools (5,6) can be used. The elaboration of the items contemplated in the proposal was based on professional experience and in the literature on the field of orofacial motricity and related to cleft lip and palate (4,5,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) . In the first version proposed, the examiners who analyzed it suggested some adjustments related to possible answers, which helped clarify the proposal.…”

“…According to some authors, the assessment of the instrument by experienced and competent examiners in the specific area to be tested is essential and should be considered in the content validation process (8,13,29) . The content validation refers to the judgment from different examiners of an instrument, who must consider the items regarding content and the relevance of objectives to be measured, as well as make suggestions on how to remove, add, or modify items (7) .On the basis of evaluation conducte by a group of experts, some authors performed content validation only by means of qualitative analysis (18,29) , whereas other authors considered it highly relevant to perform a quantitative analysis (8,13) . In this study, for the content validation, performed through analysis from the examiners, images from individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate were selected, due to its incidence and also because this type of cleft affects many aspects of the stomatognathic system.…”

Validade e reprodutibilidade do Questionário de Hábitos relacionados ao Trabalho (QHT) para trabalhadores do SAMU 192

“…A Etapa 3 de validade de conteúdo consistiu em verificar se os itens propostos pelo QHT constituemse numa amostra representativa do que se deseja medir, ou seja, em que proporção os itens do instrumento servem para medir a construção do todo 20 . Sendo assim, especialistas no assunto avaliaram quantitativamente ou qualitativamente o QHT 21,22 . Para esta avaliação, a literatura é controversa, podendo variar de cinco a 10 avaliadores 21 ou ainda entre seis e 20 especialistas 23 .…”