2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0031-10492011000500001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of diapoma (teleostei: characiformes: characidae: stevardiinae: diapomini) with descriptions of two new species from southern Brazil

Abstract: Diapoma is reviewed and four species are recognized: (1) Diapoma thauma, new species, from streams of the rio Jacuí basin, state of Rio Grande do Sul; (2) D. pyrrhopteryx, new species collected from the rio Canoas and streams flowing into this basin in the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina, Brazil; (3) Diapoma terofali, from streams flowing into rio Uruguay in Uruguay and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil and streams flowing into rio de la Plata, Argentina; and (4) Diapoma speculiferum, from lowland coas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
29
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“… Species analyzed for sperm morphology Diapomini Acrobrycon A. ipanquianus [ 22 ] , Acrobrycon sp. [ 69 ] Diapoma D. speculiferum [ 69 ] , D. terofali [ 69 ] M2 D. speculiferum [ 70 ] Planaltina P. britiskii [ 22 ] , P. glandipedis [ 47 ] , P. myersi [ 69 ] Glandulocaudini Glandulocauda G. melanogenys [ 69 ] , G. melanopleura [ 23 ] Lophiobrycon L. weitzmani [ 36 ] Mimagoniates M. barberi [ 69 ] , M. inequalis [ 22 ] , M. lateralis [ 69 ] , M. microlepis [ 69 ] , M. rheocharis [ 69 ] , M. sylvicola [ 69 ] M2 M. barberi [ 71 ] , M. microlepis [ 70 ] Hysteronotini Hysteronotus H. megalostomus [ 69 ] Pseudocorynopoma P. doriae [ 69 ] , P. heterandria [ 69 ] M2 P. doriae ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Species analyzed for sperm morphology Diapomini Acrobrycon A. ipanquianus [ 22 ] , Acrobrycon sp. [ 69 ] Diapoma D. speculiferum [ 69 ] , D. terofali [ 69 ] M2 D. speculiferum [ 70 ] Planaltina P. britiskii [ 22 ] , P. glandipedis [ 47 ] , P. myersi [ 69 ] Glandulocaudini Glandulocauda G. melanogenys [ 69 ] , G. melanopleura [ 23 ] Lophiobrycon L. weitzmani [ 36 ] Mimagoniates M. barberi [ 69 ] , M. inequalis [ 22 ] , M. lateralis [ 69 ] , M. microlepis [ 69 ] , M. rheocharis [ 69 ] , M. sylvicola [ 69 ] M2 M. barberi [ 71 ] , M. microlepis [ 70 ] Hysteronotini Hysteronotus H. megalostomus [ 69 ] Pseudocorynopoma P. doriae [ 69 ] , P. heterandria [ 69 ] M2 P. doriae ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also observed secondary modifications on the dorsal fin within clade A characids, especially in Glandulocaudini and Stevardiini. Additional variation on the number of branched dorsal fin rays within clade A characids was also reported in the literature: some species has ≤8 branched rays [ii+ 7–8: Attonitus bounties (Vari & Ortega, 2000), Bryconamericus arilepis (Román‐Valencia et al , 2008 a ), B. yokiae (Román‐Valencia, 2003 c ), Cyanocharax lepiclastus (Malabarba & Weitzman, 2003), Planaltina myersi (Menezes et al , 2003), Knodus longus (Zarske & Géry, 2006) and K. moenkhausii (Ferreira, 2007); ii+ 6–8: B. tolimae (Román‐Valencia, 2004) and B. caucanus (Román‐Valencia, 2003 a ); ii+ 6–7: B. carlosi (Román‐Valencia, 2003 d ); ii+ 7: B. charalae (Román‐Valencia, 2005), B. cismontanus (Román‐Valencia, 2003 a ) and B. galvisi (Román‐Valencia, 2000)]; others species present ≥8 branched rays [ii+ 8–9: P. britskii (Menezes et al , 2003), B. gonzalezoi (Román‐Valencia, 2002), B. macrophthalmus (Román‐Valencia, 2003 b ) and B. peruanus (Román‐Valencia, 2003 a ); ii+ 8–10: B. dahlia (Román‐Valencia, 2000)]. Given the variation observed here, a more comprehensive analysis of the number of dorsal fin rays in other clade A characids genera of Malabarba & Weitzman (2003) is necessary for a better understanding of the significance of this character as a putative synapomorphy for the group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…in the Pandeiros River for example, represents the first record of this genus in the São Francisco River basin. Currently, only three species of this genus have been described: Planaltina myersi from the Corumbá River (a tributary of the Paranaíba River), and Planaltina glandipedis and Planaltina britskii from tributaries of the Grande and Tietê rivers, all tributaries of the Upper Paraná River (Menezes et al 2003). Based on a bibliographic review undertaken for this study, and including Planaltina sp., the number of known freshwater fish species in the basin is 233 (Britski et al 1986;Weitzman 1999, 2000;Alves and Pompeu 2001;Lütken 2001;Reis et al 2003;Pompeu and Godinho 2003;Costa 2005Costa , 2006Costa , 2013Costa , 2014Silva et al 2006;Costa and Brasil 2006 Of the sixteen species collected upstream of the three waterfalls, Myleus altipinnis, Characidium aff.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%