2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0006-87052007000200014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito de práticas culturais na conversão e no balanço energéticos

Abstract: Desenvolveu-se de 1997 a 2003, em Passo Fundo (RS), um experimento constituído de quatro sistemas de manejo de solo (plantio direto, cultivo mínimo, preparo convencional de solo com arado de discos e preparo convencional de solo com arado de aivecas) e de três sistemas de rotação de culturas: sistema I (trigo/soja); sistema II (trigo/soja e ervilhaca/milho ou sorgo) e sistema III (trigo/soja, ervilhaca/milho ou sorgo e aveia branca/soja). O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos ao acaso, com parcelas subdi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparative studies, corn, along with sorghum, has shown higher energy efficiency than other grain producing species, such as soybeans, wheat, white oat and common vetch (SANTOS et al 2007). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparative studies, corn, along with sorghum, has shown higher energy efficiency than other grain producing species, such as soybeans, wheat, white oat and common vetch (SANTOS et al 2007). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SANTOS et al 2007 determined EB and EROI when comparing tillage practices in soybean system in RS state. The Table 2 -Share of each input in total energy demand in the soybean systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature presents a wide variation in the values of EE for soybean crops cultivated in Brazil. For example, several EE values have been reported for soybean crops: 5.47 (Melo et al, 2007); 18,64 (A. T. Campos, Klosowsk, Souza, Zanini, & Prestes, 2009); 7.81 (Assenheimer, Campos, & Gonçalves, 2009); 4.27 (Mourad & Walter, 2011); 9.80 (Santos, Spera, Fontaneli, & Dreon, 2011); 5.30 (Riquetti, 2014); and 13.66 (Ferreira, Neumann, & Hoffmann, 2014). In most of these studies, energy was primarily attributed to fuels (A. T. Campos et al, 2009;Ferreira et al, 2014), fertilizers (Mourad & Walter, 2011;Riquetti, 2014), herbicides (Assenheimer et al, 2009;Riquetti, 2014) and agricultural machinery (Melo et al, 2007;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%