2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2001000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning disabilities: analysis of 69 children

Abstract: -With this article we intend to demonstrate the importance of evaluation and follow up of children with learning disabilities, through a multidisciplinary team. As well as to establish the need of intervention. We evaluate 69 children, from Aline Picheth Public School, in Curitiba, attending first or second grade of elementary school, through general and evolutionary neurological examination, pediatric checklist symptoms, and social, linguistic and psychological (WISC-III, Bender Infantile and WPPSI-figures) e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Results like these agrees with other research studies that also show a higher prevalence of low school performance in male gender, i.e. indicate that boys are more often affected with learning difficulties 10,22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results like these agrees with other research studies that also show a higher prevalence of low school performance in male gender, i.e. indicate that boys are more often affected with learning difficulties 10,22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As for the performance in the written test 22 the authors observed in many children concomitant oral production of written words, suggesting an influence of the first on the second . In the present study, this type of behavior was observed in 3% of the school children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A diferença quanto ao sexo encontrada entre os dois grupos, apontando que baixo rendimento acadêmico é mais comum entre meninos que entre meninas, reafirma resultados apontados na literatura sobre maior incidência de problemas de aprendizagem entre meninos (Meister et al, 2001;Needleman, Salamanco, Murno, Lamy, & De Gentile, 1996;Rutter et al, 2004). Rutter et al (2004), rebatendo críticas de que a alta taxa de problemas na leitura entre garotos era decorrente de distorções na interpretação sobre as dificuldades apresentadas pelos meninos, relatam os resultados de quatro grandes estudos realizados na Nova Zelândia e na Inglaterra, mostrando que em todos eles a diferença entre sexos se repetiu, confirmando que os meninos são mais freqüentemente atingidos por dificuldades de leitura.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Não houve associação significativa entre sexo e indicativo de dificuldades de aprendizagem, contrariando outras pesquisas brasileiras (Meister et al, 2001;Santos & Graminha, 2005) e internacionais (Rutter et al, 2004;Saigal, Hoult, Stoskopf, Rosenbaum, & Streiner, 1998) , 2009). Não houve também associação entre sexo e problemas motores, semelhante aos resultados encontrados na pesquisa de Cairney et al (2005), onde não foram identificadas diferenças na proporção de meninos e meninas com esses problemas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified