2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492009000300002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of water drinking test performed at different times of the day

Abstract: 3 mmHg), even though Pearson's test revealed good correlation among the results. CONCLUSION: The mean IOP peak and mean IOP change observed during WDT are significantly higher in POAG patients than in control individuals. Low levels of agreement among WDTs performed at different times of the day suggest a poor reproducibility of WDT, which may limit its applicability for the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma.]]>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the SDs of approximately 4 mmHg for IOP peak and 4.5 mmHg for IOP fluctuation, it is worth noting that 79.5% of the eyes had peak IOP differences within 2 mmHg between tests and that 70.6% of the eyes had IOP fluctuation differences within 2 mmHg between tests in our sample. These proportions are close to our previous findings (reproducibility of WDT within 24 h) 16 and also to the results of Medina et al 21 that, in a small sample of 15 patients, demonstrated that 80% of patients were within 3 mmHg of agreement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the SDs of approximately 4 mmHg for IOP peak and 4.5 mmHg for IOP fluctuation, it is worth noting that 79.5% of the eyes had peak IOP differences within 2 mmHg between tests and that 70.6% of the eyes had IOP fluctuation differences within 2 mmHg between tests in our sample. These proportions are close to our previous findings (reproducibility of WDT within 24 h) 16 and also to the results of Medina et al 21 that, in a small sample of 15 patients, demonstrated that 80% of patients were within 3 mmHg of agreement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Peak IOP values (change of approximately 3 mmHg from baseline) were not significantly different before and after the LPI. These values were comparable to previous reports of peak IOP in normal eyes, and lower than those of patients with medically‐treated glaucoma (change of >5 mmHg) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These values were comparable to previous reports of peak IOP in normal eyes, 20 and lower than those of patients with medically-treated glaucoma (change of >5 mmHg). 20,21 The WDT is a stress test, which results in transient IOP increase following ingestion of 1000 mL of water (or 10 ml/kg water) during 5-15 min. One theory suggests that acute water intake results in a decrease in blood colloid osmotic pressure and subsequently shifts fluid into the choroidal space, as a result of an osmotic gradient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Medina et al 54 evaluated the reproducibility of WDT performed at different times of the day in POAG and normal individuals. The authors, based on levels of agreement, state a poor reproducibility of IOP peaks detected by the test, because 20% of glaucoma patients presented differences higher or equal to 3 mmHg among IOP peaks at different tests.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%