2020
DOI: 10.1590/2318-0331.252020190031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative model of intense rainfall equation obtained from daily rainfall disaggregation

Abstract: The objective of this work was to propose an alternative model of IDF equation based on the disaggregation of daily rainfall. Data from the rainfall gauge station code 02649018 of the Brazilian National Water Agency from the period 1968 to 2011 were used. Several extreme event probability distributions were adjusted. Rainfall intensity with a return period of 2 to 100 years and durations of 5 to 1440 minutes were estimated using the relationships between rainfall for different durations. The four coefficients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation to the use of the method developed by Pruski et al (1997) is the dependence of the intense rainfall equations in the IDF model. Although the intense rainfall equations of the IDF model are the most used in Brazil and several other countries (Back & Cadorin, 2021), there are other intense rainfall equation models or even other methods of obtaining intense rainfall by disaggregating daily rainfall (Aragão et al, 2013;Rangel & Hartwig, 2016;Back, 2020). Back et al (2020) adapted the runoff estimation method developed by Pruski et al (1997) to be applied to the alternative model of the intense rainfall equation based on the disaggregation of the maximum daily rainfall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation to the use of the method developed by Pruski et al (1997) is the dependence of the intense rainfall equations in the IDF model. Although the intense rainfall equations of the IDF model are the most used in Brazil and several other countries (Back & Cadorin, 2021), there are other intense rainfall equation models or even other methods of obtaining intense rainfall by disaggregating daily rainfall (Aragão et al, 2013;Rangel & Hartwig, 2016;Back, 2020). Back et al (2020) adapted the runoff estimation method developed by Pruski et al (1997) to be applied to the alternative model of the intense rainfall equation based on the disaggregation of the maximum daily rainfall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to aforementioned difficulties is using disaggregation indices in daily rainfall data series, i.e., from pluviometric stations (Back, 2020). In Brazil the most used method for disaggregation is that by CETESB (Aragão et al, 2013), which, albeit not based on a rigorous mathematical formalism, relies, to some extent, on the self-similarity rationale (Serinaldi, 2010) for linking maximum rainfall intensities across short time scales over large regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the determination of the IDF ratios for short-term rainfall requires long series of rainfall data and requires a great deal of effort in the tabulation, processing, analysis and interpretation of large numbers of pluviograms data (Bielenki Júnior et al, 2016;Cecílio & Pruski, 2003;Dorneles et al, 2019). Moreover, the pluviographic series, besides a smaller number, have generally shorter periods and with more failures than the pluviometric series (Back, 2020). This has led to the use of relations that allow the estimation of critical rainfall based on pluviometric data, i.e., using daily rainfall data (Silva & Oliveira, 2017), since in Brazil, there is an extensive pluviometric monitoring network (Dorneles et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%