Indícios de descolonialidade na Análise Crítica do Discurso na ADPF 186/DF

Abstract

2 ResumoEste artigo analisa o discurso de fundamentação, na ADPF 186/DF, acerca dos direitos das minorias negras. A Análise Crítica do Discurso Jurídico (ACDJ), com ênfase nos efeitos ideológicos e políticos do discurso, revela, no corpus desta análise, indícios das matrizes teóricas pós-colonial e descolonial dos direitos humanos. Assim, como resultado, desaloja-se aquilo que se oculta ideologicamente no plano do posto, do pressuposto, do implícito ou do subentendido nessa decisão do STF. A partir daí, construímos um roteiro de indicadores, no discurso, do giro descolonial, com os seguintes conceitos-chave, a saber: alteridade, exterioridade, interculturalidade, pluriversalidade e empoderamento. Palavras-chave

Contextualized Rights as Effective Rights to All: The Case of Affirmative Action in Brazil

“…This transformation turns race from a foundation for oppressive social hierarchies into a tool for dismantling such structures (Ikawa, 2008;Supremo Tribunal Federal, 2012). Indeed, Bragato and Colares (2017) interpret the recognition of the demands by Blacks in the 2012 Supreme Court decision as a "decolonial turning," a disruptive move through discourse from otherness and non-existence to inclusion and empowerment. More specifically, they stress that "the decision highlights a discourse according to which the claim itself (reservation of quotas) has the potential to break with [inferiorization] discourses and reverse the negative effects of discrimination, promoting what [a] Supreme Court justice calls inclusion, a compatible reading, in many points with the concept of empowerment" (p. 976).…”

Metodologia otra: Challenging modern/colonial matrix with Paulo Freire and decolonial thinking

“…In this vein, paraphrasing Santos' ( 2009) words, Hashizume (2019) proposes an "ecology of methods," combining ethnography and unconventional techniques, such as journalistic fact-finding and investigation (through the so-called "source" consultations). Many authors use "conventional" qualitative research methods-such as participant observation (Elder and Odoyo, 2018), ethnography (Borges, 2013;Hashizume, 2019), semi-structured interviews (Fonseca, 2016), narrative analysis (Amorim, 2020), and critical discourse analysis (Bragato and Colares, 2017)-but never uncritically and, above all, always being open to unlearn and relearn. A remarkable example is the recent work of Manning (2018), who describes the challenges and paradoxes of becoming a decolonial feminist ethnographer.…”