Risk factors for fine and gross motor development in preterm and term infants

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the association of sociodemographic, obstetrical and psychosocial factors with fine and gross motor developmental delay in preterm and term infants, in the age group of three months and one day to twelve months and twenty-nine days. Methods The term and preterm infants were evaluated by the Denver II Test for fine and gross motor skills, investigated in three phases: 165 infants in phase 1 (3 months and 1 day to 4 months and 29 days), 130 infants in stage 2 (8 months and 1 day to 9 months and 29 days) and 102 infants in phase 3 (11 months and 1 day to 12 months and 29 days). Sociodemographic, obstetrical and psychosocial data were obtained through an initial interview with family members and the psychic risk assessment through the Child Development Risk Indicators and PREAUT protocols. Statistical analysis was performed using the logistic regression model. Results Significant factors in the association with fine and gross motor delay were: maternal gestational and obstetric history (planned pregnancy, type of delivery, number of prenatal consultations, use of medication and gestational intercurrence), features and biological risks of the baby (gender, mechanical ventilation, feeding difficulty), sociodemographic factors (career and level of maternal schooling, number of children and people in the house) and psychosocial issues concerning to the family routine participation and presence of psychic risk. Conclusion There was a significant association between motor development delay of the infants, environmental and biological variables, with emphasis on psychic risk.

Impacts of COVID-19 on Neuropsychomotor Development From the Perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in a Case Series of Children Aged 4 to 24 Months Assessed in Land and Aquatic Settings

“…Most failures were related to the adaptive fine motor (40%), personal social (20%), and gross motor domains (6.66%). Corroborating these findings, Bortagarai et al 33 found greater risk/delay indices in adaptive fine motor and gross motor domains. Moreover, the research by Fauls et al 34 verified that delayed gross motor skills interfere directly with activities and participation and have consequences on socialization and cognitive function.…”

A Unifying Theory for Autism: The Pathogenetic Triad as a Theoretical Framework

“…Lower cognitive functions and gross motor coordination, on the other hand, rely on localized brain areas and simpler neural networks, limiting the effects of detrimental insults and explaining the faster and improved recovery for these cognitive functions, as well as the possibility of neural remodeling recovering the function. Insults are associated with impaired motor coordination ( 217 , 218 ), and motor dysfunction relates to cognitive ability also in neurotypical controls and ADHD [Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; ( 217 , 219 )], supporting the notion that motor dysfunction may not be a core feature of autism, but a marker of cognitive dysfunction.…”