2018
DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2017-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of variables associated with the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis created by a nephrologist

Abstract: Evaluation of variables associated with the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis created by a nephrologistAvaliação de variáveis associadas à permeabilidade de fístulas arteriovenosas criadas por um nefrologista para fins de hemodiálise Introdução: A fístula arteriovenosa (FAV) é considerada o acesso vascular padrão ouro para hemodiálise crônica, e sua falha prediz taxas mais altas de morbimortalidade. Objetivos: 1) Avaliar a taxa de sucesso da FAV criada por um nefrologista e 2) identificar vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline parameters like age, gender, diabetes and hypertension were similar to other studies. 3,9,10 The primary patency rates was 77% in our experience which was similar to other Indian experience published by plastic surgeon 11 as well as other international studies by nephrologists. 9,[12][13][14] All of 17 patients already on HD could be switched to AVF from nontunneled catheter at 4-5 weeks with adequate pump speed (300 ml/min).We followed them only for two weeks after first cannulation, no one had secondary failure/ complications in this period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline parameters like age, gender, diabetes and hypertension were similar to other studies. 3,9,10 The primary patency rates was 77% in our experience which was similar to other Indian experience published by plastic surgeon 11 as well as other international studies by nephrologists. 9,[12][13][14] All of 17 patients already on HD could be switched to AVF from nontunneled catheter at 4-5 weeks with adequate pump speed (300 ml/min).We followed them only for two weeks after first cannulation, no one had secondary failure/ complications in this period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…4,15 Four out of eight females had primary failure but it may be due to smaller arterial size in females, as many studies have proven that gender doesn't affect the outcome. 3,16 We found normotension (systolic < 120 mmHg) to be strongly associated with AVF failure as low blood flow is predisposing factor for AVF failure as in HEMO study. 17 As expected similar to other studies failure was significantly associated with lesser arterial diameter 9,10,12,13,18 , the minimum diameter on which AVF was successfully created was 1.5 mm, we didn't attempt AVF creation if cephalic vein diameter after proximal compression of arm was less than 2 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Vernaglione et al [16] found that arteriovenous fistulae may function poorly in women, with a failure rate of 50%. Inequality of gender distribution in published studies limits assessment of the possible influence of gender on the functioning of the arteriovenous fistula, which is why any correlation between gender and vascular access function remains controversial [17]. The proportion of women in our study groups was similar (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Experience shows that this should be considered favorably. García-Trío et al [18] found no difference in the rate of functioning of the arteriovenous fistula, whether created by vascular surgeons or by nephrologists [17]. Therefore, nephrologists in many dialysis centers in Europe have begun to conduct this procedure [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contudo, a maioria indicou avaliação da maturação dentro de quatro até seis semanas. (10,14,15,26,31,35,37,43,52) Ainda foram verificados estudos apontando tempos superiores a seis semanas: entre quatro e oito semanas; (56,57) dentro de dois meses após o procedimento; (40) até dois a três meses; (33) dentro de quatro meses; (29) em seis meses; (54) e outro que recomendou realizar a avaliação em duas semanas, seis semanas, três meses, seis meses e 12 meses do período pós-operatório. (53) Dentre as técnicas de avaliação clínica, 23 estudos (60,5%) recomendaram o exame físico e 15 (39,5%) a combinação anamnese e exame físico.…”
Section: Brasilunclassified