IPR 106: new Arabica coffee cultivar, resistant to some Meloidogyne paranaensis and M. incognita nematode populations of Paraná

Sera, Gustavo Hiroshi; Machado, Andressa Cristina Zamboni; Ito, Dhalton Shiguer; Shigueoka, Luciana Harumi; Silva, Santino Aleandro da; Sera, Tumoru

doi:10.1590/1984-70332020v20n3c52

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The inter‐row spacing was 2.75 m, so the plant populations per hectare for the 0.45‐, 0.60‐, 0.75‐, and 0.90‐m spacings within the rows were, respectively, equivalent to 8,080, 6,060, 4,848, and 4,040. The cultivars evaluated were IPR 98, IPR 99, IPR 100, IPR 102, IPR 103, IPR 106, IPR 107, and Mundo Novo IAC 376‐4 (Pereira & Baião, 2015; Sera, Sera, & Fazuoli, 2017; Sera et al., 2020) (Table 1).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arabica coffee yields and profitability improved by reducing the spacing within the rows

Pereira

Sera

et al. 2022

Agronomy Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plant spacing influences the yield of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) cultivars and affects profitability; however, there are few studies on it. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the yield and economic performance of Arabica coffee cultivars at different plant spacings. The experiment, conducted in Mandaguari, Paraná, Brazil, used a randomized block design with three replicates of seven plants in a split‐plot scheme. The treatments were eight cultivars (IPR 98, IPR 99, IPR 100, IPR 102, IPR 103, IPR 106, IPR 107, and Mundo Novo IAC 376‐4) at 2.75‐m inter‐rows and four plant spacings within the rows (0.45, 0.60, 0.75, and 0.90 m). The experiment was conducted between 2016 and 2020. Revenue, cost, and profit indicators were considered in the economic analysis. In general, the yields of the cultivars at closer spacings of 0.45 and 0.60 m were higher than at wider spacings of 0.75 and 0.90 m. Different plant spacing influenced the yields of IPR 98, IPR 102, and IPR 103 cultivars. High yields (>90 green coffee 60‐kg bags ha–1) were achieved with IPR 98, IPR 99, IPR 102, and IPR 103 cultivars, particularly IPR 98, which yielded 7,002.60 kg ha–1 at a spacing of 0.45 m. At 0.45‐m spacing, the IPR 98 cultivar presented the best economic result, with a positive impact on profitability.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arabica coffee yields and profitability improved by reducing the spacing within the rows

Pereira

Sera

et al. 2022

Agronomy Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…e coffee breeding category (4.1%) consists of articles that study the development and resulting coffee quality of new varieties [79], cultivars [80], genotypes [77], or germ plasms [81]. Journal of Food Quality Management practices is the category that contains most of the articles in the preharvest facet with 28.6%.…”

Section: Rq7: What Stages Of the Coffee Chain Production Arementioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Mapping Study of Coffee Quality throughout the Production-to-Consumer Chain

Rendón-Mera

Corrales²,

Mesa

2022

Journal of Food Quality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coffee is one of the most consumed beverages in the world and is crucial in the economy of many developing countries. The search to improve coffee quality comes from many fronts, as do the many ways to measure quality and the factors that affect it. Several techniques are used to measure the different metrics to assess coffee quality, across different types of coffee samples and species, and throughout the entire process from farm to cup. In this work, we conducted a systematic mapping study of 1,470 articles to identify the aspects of quality that are the most important in the scientific literature to evaluate coffee throughout the processing chain. The study revealed that cup quality and biochemical composition are the most researched quality attributes. The main objective of the reviewed studies is the correlation between different quality measurements. The most used techniques are the analytical chemistry methods. The most studied species is Coffea arabica. The most used sample presentation is green coffee. The postharvest stage is the most researched, in which quality control receives more attention. In the preharvest stage, management practices stand out. Finally, the most used type of research was the evaluation research.

show abstract

“…In recent years, extensive occurrence of the Meloidogyne paranaensis nematode has been observed in the main coffee-producing regions in Brazil (Villain et al 2018, Terra et al 2019). This will predictably affect the sustainability and survival of coffee fields, as most Coffea arabica cultivars are susceptible to this phytopathogen that attacks the plant root system (Carneiro et al 1996) and often leads to the death of susceptible coffee trees (Sera et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Currently, there are only two C. arabica cultivars resistant to M. paranaensis registered in Brazil: IPR 100 (Sera et al 2017) and IPR 106 (Sera et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

MGS Guaiçara and MGS Vereda: Coffea arabica cultivars resistant to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne paranaensis

Salgado

Fatobene

Pereira

et al. 2022

Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

IPR 106: new Arabica coffee cultivar, resistant to some Meloidogyne paranaensis and M. incognita nematode populations of Paraná

Cited by 9 publications

References 5 publications

Arabica coffee yields and profitability improved by reducing the spacing within the rows

Arabica coffee yields and profitability improved by reducing the spacing within the rows

A Systematic Mapping Study of Coffee Quality throughout the Production-to-Consumer Chain

MGS Guaiçara and MGS Vereda: Coffea arabica cultivars resistant to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne paranaensis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About