2017
DOI: 10.1590/1984-6398201711341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participação, Protagonismo E Aprendizagem Na Fala-Em-Interação De Sala De Aula Em Uma Equipe De Trabalho No Ensino Médio

Abstract: RESUMO: Neste artigo temos como objetivo reconhecer protagonismo e agentividade no trabalho de fazer aprendizagem em dados de fala-em-interação da pesquisa de mestrado de Petermann (2016) realizada em um colégio privado no Paraná que funciona por meio de projetos temáticos de aprendizagem. A perspectiva epistemológica é a da Análise da Conversa Etnometodológica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers' 'pass-on turns' were accomplished through a variety of practices (e.g., repeating the question turn) and prompted students to formulate appropriate answers to their peers' turns. A similar yet distinct practice was reported by Petermann and Jung (2017) in a study of a mixed-grade secondary History classroom in the South of Brazil. The teacher fostered students' agency during a group activity by not promptly answering their questions, and instead making further questions addressed to all the students on the subject at hand.…”
Section: Participation In Whole Group Classroom Interactionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Teachers' 'pass-on turns' were accomplished through a variety of practices (e.g., repeating the question turn) and prompted students to formulate appropriate answers to their peers' turns. A similar yet distinct practice was reported by Petermann and Jung (2017) in a study of a mixed-grade secondary History classroom in the South of Brazil. The teacher fostered students' agency during a group activity by not promptly answering their questions, and instead making further questions addressed to all the students on the subject at hand.…”
Section: Participation In Whole Group Classroom Interactionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Indeed, turn allocation and student selection can be seen as part of teachers' 'stocks of interactional knowledge' (PERÄKYLÄ; VEHVILÄINEN, 2003) and constitute one of the number of tasks that teachers, as the ones expected "to ensure that the discussion proceeds in an orderly manner" (NAS-SAJI; WELLS, 2000, p. 378), must coordinate during whole-group conversational activities. Such tasks include monitoring students' knowledge by, e.g., designing questions in ways as to elicit specific responses on notions that they are expected to have already learned (e.g., MARGUTTI, 2006), encouraging students' participation (e.g., SAHLSTRÖM, 1999), displaying affiliation with the students' contributions (e.g., TADIC; BOX, 2019; HALL; MALABARBA; KIMURA, 2019), and fostering students' agency (e.g., WILLEMSEN et al, 2019;PETERMANN;JUNG, 2017). For example, in their study of a fourth-grade classroom in the Netherlands, Willemsen et al (2019) showed how teachers dealt with students' questions and comments during whole-group conversation by returning the floor over to the students instead of responding to the questions themselves.…”
Section: Participation In Whole Group Classroom Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation