Avaliação de indicadores e vivências de prazer/sofrimento em equipes de saúde da família com o referencial da Psicodinâmica do Trabalho

Abstract

Pleasure at work for the studied teams was associated with freedom of expression, achievement, and professional recognition, and pain was related to professional exhaustion and work overload.

Saúde do trabalhador no contexto da estratégia de saúde da família: revisão integrativa de literatura

“…In this sense, studies show that the intense workload, the inappropriate environment, as well as the lack of training can lead to the illness of professionals, both from a physical and mental point of view. 9,[11][12][13]15,16,24 The workday was mentioned in all the studies analyzed as intensifying the workers' stress. Nevertheless, it is taken into account that many of them continued to work in other jobs or in homes, ahead of the chores of the home and the education of their children.…”

“…11,14 The organization of the work process was mentioned among the factors of emotional stress for workers. Multitasking, due to the lack of human resources and work protocols, lack of training in specific areas -domestic and family violence, mental health, use of illicit drugs -translate into overload and low quality in the services provided, and still generate conflicts between the teams, [12][13][14][15][16][17]24 aggravating absenteeism. 24 The lack of inputs also contributes to the physical and emotional stress of the teams, generating insecurity during the workday and delay in completing tasks.…”

“…[14][15][16]26 Another factor present in the studies was the demanding of goals and results by the management, without considering the variables described above. [14][15][16][17]24…”

“…In this category, 14 articles were included, 9,10,12,13,[15][16][17][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] which corresponds to 74% of the number of articles analyzed.…”

“…9,10,27 In this context, workers with long daily hours, especially when they have more than one job, inflexible hours and precarious working conditions, are vulnerable to psychosocial risks, being more likely to present a risk of psychological distress. 9,12,13,[15][16][17]21,24 It appears that the institutional requirements -of the community and personal -, associated with the actions involved in the act of working, lead to consequences such as loss of the profession's specifics, distortion of its attributions and states of alienation, expressed by the little reflection and discussion about the own practice. This process, in turn, catalyzes psychological suffering.…”