The Political Economy of Innovation Why is Brazil Stuck in the Technology Ladder? ,

Abstract

The essay considers the role of big private businesses (BBs) within the Brazilian national system of innovation (NSI). Our question is as follows: How do the innovation practices and political behavior adopted by BBs shape the Brazilian NSI? It is our claim that although BBs play a prominent role in leading innovation nationally, they are not supportive of institution-intensive solutions for strengthening the NSI, and thereby contribute to the creation of a dynamic that we call the 'low-innovation trap'. The obstacles to escaping this trap are manifold, but here we shall focus on 01. the lack of coordination between actors and instruments within government, 02. the high level of instability in the Science, Technology and Innovation (ST&I) budget, 03. the increasing obstacles faced by BBs wishing to innovate and 04. the lack of correspondence between government proposals and societal demands. Without a strong coalition pushing for it to be upgraded, it is likely that the NSI will remain unfit for purpose.

Trends on Microalgae-Fungi Consortia Research: An Alternative for Biofuel Production?

“…Also, the increase in investments in Research & Development (R&D) in China has contributed to the rising of Science (Gonzalez-Brambila et al, 2016 ). In 2017, the Chinese government invested 2.15% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in R&D. This amount is only lower than that found in South Korea, Japan, Germany, the USA, and France's R&D investments (Chiarini et al, 2020 ).…”

Universities in inclusive regional innovation systems: Academic engagement and uneven knowledge use in Brazil

“…In Brazil, universities are reasonably evenly dispersed across the country's territory (Figure 3), theoretically enabling them to play a more active role in reducing knowledge inequalities. However, despite federal policies aimed at expanding and decentralizing scientific knowledge production (Chiarini et al, 2020), intellectual and research assets remain concentrated in the South and Southeast regions of the country (Albuquerque, 2002; Araújo & Garcia, 2019; Chiarini et al, 2014; Santos & Caliari, 2012; Sidone et al, 2016), anchored in the so‐called “scientific quartet” (Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, and Rio Grande do Sul) (Chiarini et al, 2014). This reinforces the idea that science, technology, and innovation dynamics differ regionally and are concentrated.…”

Growth slowdowns at middle income levels: Identifying mechanisms of external constraints

“…This recent process has reopened the question about the dependence on high commodity prices to sustain inclusive development strategies (Foxley & Stallings, 2016; Lebdioui et al., 2021; Ocampo, 2017). Several works have highlighted that the limits of sustained development in Latin America are strongly rooted in the inability to build broad political coalitions that support the institutional changes required to overcome the productive limitations (Chiarini et al., 2020; Doner & Schneider, 2016).…”