2016
DOI: 10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wonderful, Magnanimous, Spectacular and Possible World of Traveling Circuses in Brazil

Abstract: This paper aims to examine the everyday management of traveling circuses in Brazil by looking for the practices and strategies that allow them to survive over time. To this end, it relies on theories about the management of everyday life developed by De Certeau. The discourses of individuals working at small, medium and large circuses is analysed to reveal their routine strategies and tactics. This analysis reveals the complexities and contradictions involved in the management of such organizations, while deba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study has contributed to improve the debate about this topic, based on the available literature, by highlighting work within a given social order (a structure), rather than just as an individual-subjective element investigated from a psychological perspective (Aguiar et al, 2016;Colet & Mozzato, 2019;Natt et al, 2019;Silva & Cappelle, 2015;Silva et al, 2020;Werner et al, 2017). Therefore, we understand that more than stating how people feel at the time they perform a given activity, mainly an activity that is not seen as profession (Dubar, 2012), it is also important to (re)acknowledge that eventual meanings of work depend on a given social order and on organizing processes (practices) comprising rules and standards that group and coerce people to be acknowledged as belonging (established) to a given social group, or not (outsiders).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study has contributed to improve the debate about this topic, based on the available literature, by highlighting work within a given social order (a structure), rather than just as an individual-subjective element investigated from a psychological perspective (Aguiar et al, 2016;Colet & Mozzato, 2019;Natt et al, 2019;Silva & Cappelle, 2015;Silva et al, 2020;Werner et al, 2017). Therefore, we understand that more than stating how people feel at the time they perform a given activity, mainly an activity that is not seen as profession (Dubar, 2012), it is also important to (re)acknowledge that eventual meanings of work depend on a given social order and on organizing processes (practices) comprising rules and standards that group and coerce people to be acknowledged as belonging (established) to a given social group, or not (outsiders).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These artists are sometimes seen as filthy (Douglas, 1966) and tramps, and they are also attacked by those who marginalize them and who do not see circus arts presented at traffic lights as a job. It seems contradictory for a society that stigmatizes circus arts performed at traffic lights to be willing to pay for the performance of artists working in traditional canvas traveling circuses (Aguiar, Carrieri, & Souza, 2016;Natt, Aguiar, & Carrieri, 2019). Presenting a sociological perspective on how the ideas of stigma and deviance associated with the work performed by circus artists are built, based on the experiences reported by these artists, themselves, is what motivates this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O nosso trabalho contribui para o avanço do debate sobre o tema, considerando a literatura existente, quando busca evidenciar o trabalho dentro de um ordenamento social (uma estrutura), e não apenas como um elemento individual-subjetivo estudado por uma perspectiva psicológica (Aguiar et al, 2016;Colet & Mozzato, 2019;Natt et al, 2019;Silva & Cappelle, 2015;Silva et al, 2020;Werner et al, 2017). Portanto, entendemos que mais do que enunciar como as pessoas se sentem ao realizar um trabalho, especialmente uma atividade que não seja considerada uma profissão (Dubar, 2012), também é importante (re)conhecer que eventuais sentidos do trabalho dependem de uma ordem social e processos organizativos (práticas) com regras e normas, que agrupam e coagem as pessoas para serem reconhecidas como pertencentes (estabelecidos) a um grupo social ou não (outsiders).…”
Section: Conclusõesunclassified
“…Os artistas, por vezes, são vistos como sujos (Douglas, 1966) e vagabundos, além de serem agredidos por aqueles que os marginalizam e que não consideram a arte circense apresentada em um semáforo como um trabalho. Parece contraditório que uma sociedade que estigmatiza a arte circense performada no semáforo estar disposta a pagar por uma apresentação em um circo tradicional de lona e itinerante (Aguiar, Carrieri, & Souza, 2016;Natt, Aguiar, & Carrieri, 2019). O que motiva esta pesquisa é justamente apresentar um olhar sociológico sobre como são construídas as noções de estigma e desvio sobre o trabalho dos artistas circenses a partir das experiências reportadas pelos próprios artistas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Although Anderson (2008), Junquilho, Almeida and Silva (2012), Oliveira and Cavedon (2013), Carrieri et al (2014), Barros and Carrieri (2015), Aguiar, Carrieri and Souza (2016), among others, do not deny cultural plurality when offering their contributions to the study of management regarding its ordinary aspects, they do not address specifically how this diversity involves the relationships of resistance and forms of survival in the organizing of a production such as handicraft. To fill this gap, this article contributes to the discussion of alternative paths to study management, ways to organize, cultural diversity, and handicraft itself, placing the artisan as an ordinary manager, protagonist of his/her history of survival within cultural plurality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%