2017
DOI: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n5p298-303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation controller mechanically actuated by soil-water tension: II - Field evaluations

Abstract: A B S T R A C TIn this study, a field evaluation of the performance of an irrigation controller mechanically actuated by soil-water tension (SWT) was performed. The controller employs a tensiometer used as a sensor of SWT to directly control a mechanically actuated hydraulic valve. Six controllers were installed in an orchard to control the irrigation for six rows of plants over 64 days. Each controller controlled the irrigation of one lateral drip line. The drip irrigation system was gravity-fed from a water … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluctuations can be the result of diurnal changes in ambient temperature that can exert a contraction or expansion effect on the volume of air inside the tensiometer, and, consequently, alter the signal emitted by the sensitive mechanism of the pressure transducer (Thalheimer, 2013). Another issue that may be associated with this behavior is the dynamics of soil water redistribution, which, associated with evaporation and drainage, occurs differently between each soil type and between each container, and which may interfere with the matric potential close to the porous capsule of the tensiometer (Almeida et al, 2017). During the 14-day evaluation period for irrigation automation, the values read by electronic tensiometers showed different responses in each soil type, which resulted in different irrigation cycles for RYL and RN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fluctuations can be the result of diurnal changes in ambient temperature that can exert a contraction or expansion effect on the volume of air inside the tensiometer, and, consequently, alter the signal emitted by the sensitive mechanism of the pressure transducer (Thalheimer, 2013). Another issue that may be associated with this behavior is the dynamics of soil water redistribution, which, associated with evaporation and drainage, occurs differently between each soil type and between each container, and which may interfere with the matric potential close to the porous capsule of the tensiometer (Almeida et al, 2017). During the 14-day evaluation period for irrigation automation, the values read by electronic tensiometers showed different responses in each soil type, which resulted in different irrigation cycles for RYL and RN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior of the automation system was observed throughout an evaluation period of 14 days, with a total of 19 activations for RYL and 31 activations for RN. According to Almeida et al (2017), an irrigation controller is considered adequate when critical values are kept within a tolerance of up to 20% in relation to the adopted threshold, and this variation must occur in at least 90% of the operating time of the system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%