“…Braun et al [ 64 ], in a summary on SPS for South America, conclude that SPS are economically attractive alternatives, which allow for deriving different products (e.g., timber, beef, milk, fruits) at different times, and that the inclusion of trees results in a more secure long-term income while the beef component is more oriented towards short-term incomes. Other authors, such as da Silva Santos and Grzebieluckas [ 100 ] for Matto Grosso in Brazil, Quaresma Maneschy et al [ 101 ] for Pará in Brazil, Alonzo [ 102 ] for Belize, Boscana et al [ 103 ] for Uruguay, Rade et al [ 104 ] for Ecuador, Ramírez-Martínez and Salas-Razo [ 105 ] for Michoacan in Mexico, and Bernardy et al [ 106 ] for Brazil, have also provided insights into the financial viability of different SPS setups in Latin America, evidencing positive results in most cases.…”