2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic-environmental assessment of silvo-pastoral systems in Colombia: An ecosystem service perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deforestation areas recorded in the municipality of Cacoal-Rondonia, Brazil, corresponded to private rural properties and the 7 de Setembro indigenous reserve [20,21]. Among the factors involved are: i) the conversion of these areas to cattle or crops in the case of the private properties; ii) timber exploitation in the case of the indigenous reserve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deforestation areas recorded in the municipality of Cacoal-Rondonia, Brazil, corresponded to private rural properties and the 7 de Setembro indigenous reserve [20,21]. Among the factors involved are: i) the conversion of these areas to cattle or crops in the case of the private properties; ii) timber exploitation in the case of the indigenous reserve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un estudio publicado por Torres et al (2023) señala que en las Américas, y específicamente en Ecuador, los sistemas silvopastoriles han mejorado la salud del suelo y han contribuido a la conservación de pastizales abiertos. Además, estos sistemas han sido reconocidos por su potencial para mejorar la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas (Sandoval et al, 2023).…”
Section: Beneficios Para La Conservaciónunclassified
“…Multiple studies underscore the significant role that improved forages can play in sustainably augmenting productivity in both meat and milk production, translating to increased incomes for livestock producers (e.g., Burkart et al, 2021;Enciso et al, 2021;Karimi et al, 2022;Maina et al, 2020;Paul et al, 2020;Sandoval et al, 2023;Schiek et al, 2018). Moreover, these improved forages have enhanced resilience to extreme weather conditions, including drought and waterlogging, and thus contribute to adaptation, that is, in silvo-pastoral or agroforestry systems (Macedo Pezzopane et al, 2019;Montagnini et al, 2013;Naranjo Ramírez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the adoption of improved forages can significantly aid mitigation by producing more biomass, thereby reducing the land needed for cultivation and animal feeding, which can be allocated for afforestation, conservation, crop production, or infrastructure development (Cohn et al, 2014;Edwards et al, 2021). Likewise, improved forages also have the potential to curtail CH 4 emissions related to ruminant diets, as well as for biological nitrification inhibition and carbon sequestration (Sandoval et al, 2023;de Souza Congio et al, 2021;Thornton & Herrero, 2010). In Africa, economic and environmental benefits have also been identified from the use of improved forages by several scholars (e.g., Cheruiyot et al, 2020;Dey et al, 2022;Maina et al, 2020;Njarui et al, 2021;Notenbaert et al, 2021;Schiek et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%