2015
DOI: 10.1590/1679-39518879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conciliando agência e contexto na dinâmica da mudança institucional

Abstract: ResumoEste ensaio apresenta estrutura analítica que busca conciliar elementos da agência e do contexto na análise de processos de mudança institucional. A estrutura está baseada na articulação entre as abordagens do institutional work e da mudança institucional gradual. Ambas as abordagens foram criadas como alternativas a perspectivas que enfatizavam demasiadamente elementos estruturais (como a path dependence theory) ou a ação (como o empreendedorismo institucional). No entanto, apesar dos ganhos analíticos … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
16
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of institutional work is concentrated on the agency dimension through the involvement of actors in processes of institutional change through physical and mental efforts, to affect institutions (Baratter, Ferreira, & Costa, 2010). Therefore, individuals and organizations that are involved in the creation, interpretation, maintenance, and change of institutional rules and standards can provide collective responses to the environment (Coraiola, Jacometti, Baratter, & Gonçalves, 2015;Hasselbladh & Kallinikos, 2000;Lawrence & Suddaby, 2006;Scott, 1994).…”
Section: Institutional Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The focus of institutional work is concentrated on the agency dimension through the involvement of actors in processes of institutional change through physical and mental efforts, to affect institutions (Baratter, Ferreira, & Costa, 2010). Therefore, individuals and organizations that are involved in the creation, interpretation, maintenance, and change of institutional rules and standards can provide collective responses to the environment (Coraiola, Jacometti, Baratter, & Gonçalves, 2015;Hasselbladh & Kallinikos, 2000;Lawrence & Suddaby, 2006;Scott, 1994).…”
Section: Institutional Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional work scholars seek to clarify the role of the agency in the institutional dynamics (Coraiola et al, 2015), that is, its focus is on understanding how action influences the existing social and institutional structures through the work of individuals, groups, and organizations to promote the creation, maintenance or disruption of institutions (Lawrence, Suddaby, & Leca, 2009;Moisander, Hirsto, & Fahy, 2016). In this stream of research, institutional creation is the category that has been drawing the most attention from organizational scholars (Coraiola et al, 2015;Lawrence & Suddaby, 2006), specifically regarding understanding the necessary characteristics and conditions for the emergence of new institutions. Moreover, institutional work involves the construction of rules and their inherent rewards and sanctions (Canning & O'Dwyer, 2016).…”
Section: Institutional Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flexibility is key to this new construct that is used to demonstrate that two extremes of institutional theory -institutional work and institutional logic -are not antagonistic or established in a duality of behavior, but have limits that are porous and sometimes may overlap, based on the reflexivity of the individual (DEROY; CLEGG, 2015) The authors' request, therefore, is that future research adopts recursive contingency to understand the processes of reproduction of institutions over time and also the unexpected collapse of institutional structures. From the perspective of institutional reproduction, the "Brazilian way" ("jeitinho brasileiro" 1 ), as a characteristic practice of interpersonal relationships, is mapped as a relevant phenomenon (PEDROSO; MASSUKADO-NAKATANI; MUSSI, 2009) However, from the perspective of the unexpected collapse of institutional structures, the abrupt rupture of the Brazilian shipbuilding program (SILVA;MARTINS, 2007), as well as the economic recession of 2015(ROLDÃO et al, 2018 provide unique characteristics to be analyzed.…”
Section: Complementary Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the theoretical perspective has progressively evolved in international journals, the subject is still embryonic in the context of studies regarding the Brazilian context. By the end of 2017, there were fewer than a dozen articles that used the theory in their empirical studies (i.e., JACOMETTI; GONCAVES; DE CASTRO, 2014; SANDER; CUNHA, 2013; LEONEL JUNIOR; CUNHA, 2013; MIRANDA; CALMON, 2016) or articulated it with other lenses of analysis (CORAIOLA et al, 2015;DONELLY, 2010;TURETA;JÚLIO, 2016). A possible reason for the absence of papers using this theoretical perspective lies in the novelty of this approach to Brazilian authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%