2020
DOI: 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological and molecular detection of Mycoplasma bovis in milk samples from bovine clinical mastitis

Abstract: The genus Mycoplasma includes more than 200 bacterial species that cause disease in animals. It is responsible for causing mastitis in bovines and may be related to other manifestations, such as arthritis and pneumonia in calves and heifers. The present study aimed to detect Mycoplasma bovis isolated from milk samples of bovine clinical mastitis, and to compare the isolation rates in two culture media: Hayflick and SP4. An initial screening was performed in order to detect the presence of the class Mollicutes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed here that milk from udders with Mycoplasma mastitis tended to have greater SCC when compared to udders with non-Mycoplasma mastitis or a healthy udder. This is in consistent with previous studies that have linked the high somatic cell content to the prevalence of Mycoplasma mastitis [38,39,58]. We also showed that both Mycoplasma mastitis and non-Mycoplasma mastitis induced significant changes in the milk components.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We showed here that milk from udders with Mycoplasma mastitis tended to have greater SCC when compared to udders with non-Mycoplasma mastitis or a healthy udder. This is in consistent with previous studies that have linked the high somatic cell content to the prevalence of Mycoplasma mastitis [38,39,58]. We also showed that both Mycoplasma mastitis and non-Mycoplasma mastitis induced significant changes in the milk components.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Забір крові проводили для визначення в сироватці крові концентрації Среактивного білка (СРБ), глюкози, креатиніну, молочної та піровиноградної кислот; досліджували активність таких ферментів як аспартатамінотрансфераза (АСТ; КФ 2.6.1.1), аланінамінотрансфераза (АЛТ; КФ 2.6.1.2). Цитохімічними методами в лімфоцитах крові визначали активність: сукцинатдегідрогеназа (СДГ; КФ 1.3.99.1) (Salina et al, 2020), гліцерол-3-фосфат дегідрогеназа (ГФДГ; КФ 1.1.99.5) та НАДНдегідрогеназа (НАДНД; КФ 1.6.5.3) (Salina et al, 2020). Для оцінки статистично значущих змін тварин після завершення терапії був використанний непараметричний критерій знаків G (Salina et al, 2020).…”
Section: матеріал і методи дослідженьunclassified
“…Цитохімічними методами в лімфоцитах крові визначали активність: сукцинатдегідрогеназа (СДГ; КФ 1.3.99.1) (Salina et al, 2020), гліцерол-3-фосфат дегідрогеназа (ГФДГ; КФ 1.1.99.5) та НАДНдегідрогеназа (НАДНД; КФ 1.6.5.3) (Salina et al, 2020). Для оцінки статистично значущих змін тварин після завершення терапії був використанний непараметричний критерій знаків G (Salina et al, 2020).…”
Section: матеріал і методи дослідженьunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, PCR techniques targeting the 16S rRNA gene do not reliably distinguish between them unless additional methods are used such as melting temperature analysis of the PCR products, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of the amplicons [64], the use of different spp. primers [65], DNA sequencing [25]. Recently, DNA sequencing based on 16S rRNA sequence analysis can distinguish between 130 different Mycoplasma spp.…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of Mycoplasma Bovismentioning
confidence: 99%