2015
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.0367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistência de híbridos de milho convencionais e isogênicos transgênicos a Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Abstract: This study evaluated the effect of damage caused by S. frugiperda on yield of maize hybrids and their conventional and isogenic transgenic versions, with different Bt toxins, in field conditions. Experiments were conducted in the municipalities of Campinas and Mococa, São Paulo State, Brazil, in the growing seasons of 2010/2011 and 2011/2012, in a randomized complete block design, with 12 treatments and four replications. The variables evaluated were: grain productivity, one hundred grain weight and grain yiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The major damage in the transgenic hybrid P 3862 HX and in the conventional BM 3061 confirms that plants without or with only 1 protein (Yieldgard®, Monsanto, São Paulo, Brazil; Total Liberty®, Bayer, São Paulo, Brazil; and Herculex®, Du Pont/Dow AgroScience, São Paulo, Brazil) are more vulnerable to S. frugiperda, whereas genotypes with more than 1 protein, such as Impact VIP 3, are less vulnerable (Michelotto et al 2013;Moraes et al 2015). Reduction of S. frugiperda damage with the interaction of integrated pest management and Impact VIP 3 demonstrates that genotypes with a single protein, such as P 3862 HX (Cry1F), should not be used as an isolated strategy in S. frugiperda integrated pest management, and that combinations of these are the best alternative for pest management in agricultural crops (Bueno et al 2011;Ramalho et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major damage in the transgenic hybrid P 3862 HX and in the conventional BM 3061 confirms that plants without or with only 1 protein (Yieldgard®, Monsanto, São Paulo, Brazil; Total Liberty®, Bayer, São Paulo, Brazil; and Herculex®, Du Pont/Dow AgroScience, São Paulo, Brazil) are more vulnerable to S. frugiperda, whereas genotypes with more than 1 protein, such as Impact VIP 3, are less vulnerable (Michelotto et al 2013;Moraes et al 2015). Reduction of S. frugiperda damage with the interaction of integrated pest management and Impact VIP 3 demonstrates that genotypes with a single protein, such as P 3862 HX (Cry1F), should not be used as an isolated strategy in S. frugiperda integrated pest management, and that combinations of these are the best alternative for pest management in agricultural crops (Bueno et al 2011;Ramalho et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Palavras Chave: lagarta-do-cartucho; parasitoides; Resistência de plantas a insetos; Zea mays Corn (Zea mays L.; Poaceae) is one of the most important agricultural crops in the world, but pests can compromise the yield and quality of this plant (Teixeira et al 2014;Moraes et al 2015). Lepidoptera larvae are among the most significant corn pests in Brazil, especially Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius sensu Guenée (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Helicoverpa zea Boddie (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Mocis latipes (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), and Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Pereira et al 2000;Girón-Pérez et al 2014;Paiva et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are attributable to the presence of genes of B. thuringiensis bacteria with insecticidal activity against S. frugiperda (Moraes et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A resistência do tipo não-preferência ocorre quando a planta é menos utilizada pelo inseto, para alimentação, oviposição, ou abrigo, do que outra planta em igualdade de condições, podendo ser de natureza física, química e/ou morfológica (BOIÇA JUNIOR et al, 2013;MORAES, 2015).…”
Section: Fv Glunclassified