2021
DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.5279.3493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support surfaces for intraoperative pressure injury prevention: systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract: Objective: to evaluate evidence on effectiveness support surfaces for pressure injury prevention in the intraoperative period. Method: systematic review. The search for primary studies was conducted in seven databases. The sample consisted of 10 studies. The synthesis of the results was carried out descriptively and through meta-analysis. Results: when comparing low-tech support surfaces with regular care (standard surgical table mattress), the meta-analysis showed that there is no statistically significant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the methodological evaluation of the primary studies, the tools proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute were used, and none of them have a scoring system for the general evaluation of the research, but it can be affirmed that a greater quantity of “yes” answers is indicative of better results. methodological quality 24 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the methodological evaluation of the primary studies, the tools proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute were used, and none of them have a scoring system for the general evaluation of the research, but it can be affirmed that a greater quantity of “yes” answers is indicative of better results. methodological quality 24 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sé ACS, Oliveira EBS, Lima LLM, Oliveira RCS, Trivino GS, Lobato IS, Medeiros FM, Pestana LC, Gonçalves RCS, Gonçalves EF, Freitas VL A recent systematic review found no statistically significant difference between the standard operating table mattress and low-technology support surfaces. Still, the opposite was observed compared to high-and low-technology support surfaces, with high technology being more effective 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Si la tasa de respuesta fue baja, ¿se manejó adecuadamente? ; § § S = Sí; |||| N = No; ¶ ¶ NA =No aplicable; *** I = Incierto En la evaluación metodológica de los estudios primarios se utilizaron las herramientas propuestas por el Joanna Briggs Institute, y ninguna de ellas cuenta con un sistema de puntuación para la evaluación general de la investigación, sin embargo, se puede decir que un mayor número de respuestas "sí" es indicativo de una mejor calidad metodológica (24) .…”
Section: La Herramienta Jbi Critical Appraisal Checklist Forunclassified