2013
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-0957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural validity and reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Evidence from a large Brazilian community sample

Abstract: The structure and reliability of the Brazilian version of the PANAS are consistent with those of its original version. Taken together, these results attest the validity of the Brazilian adaptation of the instrument.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
14

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
49
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Entre eles, os instrumentos de Kammann e Flett (1983), Watson et al (1988) e Quirin et al (2009) possuem estruturas teóricas semelhantes e baseadas nas dimensões afetos positivos e afetos negativos, enquanto os instrumentos de Mehrabian e Russell (1974), Betella e Verschure (2016), Scherer et al (2013) e Yik et al (2011) apresentam fundamentação teórica similar à do circumplexo, com base nas dimensões valência e ativação. De todas as escalas identificadas na literatura especializada, apenas a PANAS (Carvalho et al, 2013;Zanon & Hutz, 2014) possui evidências de validade no Brasil.…”
Section: Figura 1 Dimensões E Variáveis Constituintes Do Circumplexunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Entre eles, os instrumentos de Kammann e Flett (1983), Watson et al (1988) e Quirin et al (2009) possuem estruturas teóricas semelhantes e baseadas nas dimensões afetos positivos e afetos negativos, enquanto os instrumentos de Mehrabian e Russell (1974), Betella e Verschure (2016), Scherer et al (2013) e Yik et al (2011) apresentam fundamentação teórica similar à do circumplexo, com base nas dimensões valência e ativação. De todas as escalas identificadas na literatura especializada, apenas a PANAS (Carvalho et al, 2013;Zanon & Hutz, 2014) possui evidências de validade no Brasil.…”
Section: Figura 1 Dimensões E Variáveis Constituintes Do Circumplexunclassified
“…Quando o conteúdo da PANAS é avaliado, apenas afetos com alta e moderada ativações são medidos pelos itens, como pode ser visto nas duas escalas PANAS traduzidas no Brasil (Carvalho et al, 2013;Zanon & Hutz, 2014). Tal característica não tem relação apenas com as propriedades do objeto de mensuração da escala, mas também pode vir a afetar futuras associações entre diferentes construtos, quando escores derivados da PANAS são utilizados.…”
unclassified
“…The study was conducted to assess the impact of urban violence on the prevalence of alcohol dependence, unipolar mood and anxiety disorders, and other mental health-related problems. A detailed description of the protocol of this study is provided elsewhere by Andreoli et al 31 All participants were assessed in their households by trained non-clinicians using structured questionnaire and interview measures used widely in international research in psychology and psychiatry, including the 20-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) 30 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 2.1. 32,33 All instruments were previously adapted and validated for use in Brazil or, in the case of some inventories including the PANAS, carefully translated to Brazilian Portuguese via standard procedures of translation/back-translation.…”
Section: Participants and Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interview version of PANAS has been previously validated. 30 Respondents were asked to rate, on a 5-point Likert scale (''very slightly or not at all'' to ''very much''), the extent to which they experienced each particular emotion within a general time-frame (i.e., ''in general, in your life as a whole''), yielding trait-oriented scores.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation