2021
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

Abstract: IntroductionThe factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) is still a topic of debate. There are several reasons why using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) for scale validation is advantageous and can help understand and resolve conflicting results in the factor analytic literature. ObjectiveThe main objective of the present study was to advance the knowledge regarding the factor structure underlying the PA-NAS scores by utilizing the different functionalities of the EGA method. E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a person dominated by negative affects tend to harbour negative feelings such as detachment, boredom, sadness, guilt, shame and envy. They are, therefore, prone to react to negative stimuli aggressively and to emotional lability, stress and negative views [ 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a person dominated by negative affects tend to harbour negative feelings such as detachment, boredom, sadness, guilt, shame and envy. They are, therefore, prone to react to negative stimuli aggressively and to emotional lability, stress and negative views [ 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the participants were asked to complete a PANAS mood scale [ 38 ]. In the PANAS mood scale, a more positive mood is associated with happiness, and a more negative mood is associated with anxiety [ 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redundant items clustered together and form a minor factor, leading dimensionality analysis methods such as EGA to overfactor, to identify three factors (instead of two factors) even considering that the factor composed of the redundant items is not substantively meaningful. Other examples of dimensionality analysis methods overfactoring due to redundant items can be found in the literature Flores-Kanter, Garrido, Moretti, and Medrano (2021). As such, after redundancy was accounted for, the dimensionality analysis (on the 14-item PSOC) recovered only the two theoretical factors of Efficacy and Satisfaction.…”
Section: Dimensionality and Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if research aims to evaluate the 16-item PSOC scale psychometric properties, these two redundancies should be accounted for, since redundancies lead to not only problems regarding dimensionality identification (Flores-Kanter et al, 2021), but also inflated internal consistency reliability.…”
Section: Dimensionality and Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%