2017
DOI: 10.1590/1415-4714.2017v20n4p728.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singularidade e mito: o corpo como potência subversiva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the international literature, there is a dearth of empirical psychological research in the Brazilian context (or with the Brazilian population).Most Brazilian studies are theoretical and employ a qualitative approach (Bicca, Duquia, Breunig, Souza, & Almeida, 2013;Corso & Corso, 2014;Dadalte, Mariano, Pedrão, & Soares, 2013;Macedo & Paravidini, 2014;Macedo, Paravidini, & Próchno, 2014;Pinheiro & Carvalho, 2017;Rodriguez & Carreteiro, 2014), viewing tattoos mostly as a form of subjectivation, as a search for identity through symbolic means. Studies with quantitative and psychometric approaches are thus lacking in the Brazilian context (Conti et al, 2012;Gouveia, et al, 2010;Medeiros, Gouveia, Pimentel, Soares, & Lima, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the international literature, there is a dearth of empirical psychological research in the Brazilian context (or with the Brazilian population).Most Brazilian studies are theoretical and employ a qualitative approach (Bicca, Duquia, Breunig, Souza, & Almeida, 2013;Corso & Corso, 2014;Dadalte, Mariano, Pedrão, & Soares, 2013;Macedo & Paravidini, 2014;Macedo, Paravidini, & Próchno, 2014;Pinheiro & Carvalho, 2017;Rodriguez & Carreteiro, 2014), viewing tattoos mostly as a form of subjectivation, as a search for identity through symbolic means. Studies with quantitative and psychometric approaches are thus lacking in the Brazilian context (Conti et al, 2012;Gouveia, et al, 2010;Medeiros, Gouveia, Pimentel, Soares, & Lima, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%