2020
DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320202510.24742018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influência do nível socioeconômico, idade, gordura corporal e sintomas depressivos na frequência de atividade física em adultos: uma análise de caminhos

Abstract: Resumo A atividade física é um comportamento complexo e influenciado por variáveis sociodemográficas e clínicas. A melhor compreensão desses fatores possibilita considerar a associação deles com a atividade física. O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar os efeitos do nível socioeconômico, idade, gordura corporal e sintomas depressivos na frequência de atividade física entre adultos. Trata-se de um estudo transversal de base populacional conduzido com 808 indivíduos. Foram avaliadas as inter-relações entre as vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our current work only examined individuals from one town in Kenya with differing socio-economic status, the findings do however mirror other studies comparing higher-and lower-income countries which show that lower-income individuals tend to be more active than their higher income counterparts [41]. There is however an ongoing debate in the literature with dissenting studies refuting this association [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…While our current work only examined individuals from one town in Kenya with differing socio-economic status, the findings do however mirror other studies comparing higher-and lower-income countries which show that lower-income individuals tend to be more active than their higher income counterparts [41]. There is however an ongoing debate in the literature with dissenting studies refuting this association [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%