2019
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018248.18502017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumentos de evaluación de la autolesión no suicida en adolescentes 1990-2016: una revisión sistemática

Abstract: Resumen El propósito de esta revisión sistemática fue identificar los instrumentos creados o adaptados para evaluar la autolesión no suicida en adolescentes. Se utilizó la metodología PRISMA. Dos revisores independientes analizaron las propiedades psicométricas de los instrumentos publicados en inglés o español desde 1990 a 2016 considerando criterios de calidad estandarizados. Las bases utilizadas fueron PsycINFO, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, SciELO, ScienceDirect y EBSCO. Se seleccionaron 18 estudio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that self-injury is one of the behaviors with the highest health risk (see Table 1), it is worrying that a little more than a quarter of the girls in the sample responded that they have self-injured; boys also responded affirmatively, although in a smaller proportion than girls, confirming this relationship reported in previous research [67][68][69][70]. However, boys start earlier; more boys (slightly more than one-fifth of the sample), almost twice as many as the girls, began self-injury when younger than nine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Considering that self-injury is one of the behaviors with the highest health risk (see Table 1), it is worrying that a little more than a quarter of the girls in the sample responded that they have self-injured; boys also responded affirmatively, although in a smaller proportion than girls, confirming this relationship reported in previous research [67][68][69][70]. However, boys start earlier; more boys (slightly more than one-fifth of the sample), almost twice as many as the girls, began self-injury when younger than nine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“… 6 NSSI reporting or detection in adolescents in different countries varies greatly due to differences in the definition of NSSI behaviour, measurement methods, and sample representation. 7 For instance, the NSSI detection rate among adolescents in the US is 17.2%. 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original FASM evaluates both the 11 types of NSSI behaviors and 22 function domains of NSSI (i.e., reasons for engaging in NSSI) that directly affect treatment (10)(11)(12). The short version of FASM is preferable to facilitate the inclusion of NSSI in a clinical setting (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%