2015
DOI: 10.1590/01047760201521031740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EQUAÇÕES HIPSOMÉTRICAS PARA Eucalyptus spp. NÃO MANEJADO EM IDADE AVANÇADA COM TÉCNICAS DE INCLUSÃO DE COVARIANTES

Abstract: EQUAÇÕES HIPSOMÉTRICAS PARA Eucalyptus spp. NÃO MANEJADO EM IDADE AVANÇADA COM TÉCNICAS DE INCLUSÃO DE COVARIANTESRESUMO: Objetivo do trabalho foi estabelecer equações hipsométricas para Eucalyptus spp. não manejado em idade avançada. Para isto, foram mensurados o diâmetro e a altura de 513 fustes distribuídos em 11 espécies e ajustes hipsométricos foram testados por seis modelos de regressão, sendo selecionado aquele com os melhores valores de Critério de Informação de Akaike (AIC), Erro Padrão da Estimativa … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For construction of a family of dominant height curves based on the average DBH, we proceeded according to the guide curve methodology (CLUTTER et al, 1983;BINOTI et al, 2012;RETSLAFF et al, 2015). For this purpose, the nonlinear function usually known as Chapman-Richards was used [1], which belongs to the so called biological functions, for their demonstrated flexibility for studies related to growth phenomenon (RICHARDS, 1959;OSUMI, 1983;VANCLAY, 1994;MARTÍNEZ PASTUR et al, 1997;CHAUCHARD, 2001;CARRERO et al, 2008;IVANCICH et al, 2011;ATTIS BELTRÁN et al, 2015;DO AMARAL MACHADO et al, 2015;OLIVEIRA et al, 2015). Where h dom : dominant height; a: parameter related to the asymptote of the function; b: parameter related to the rate of change; c: parameter linked to the inflection point; Da: average DBH.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For construction of a family of dominant height curves based on the average DBH, we proceeded according to the guide curve methodology (CLUTTER et al, 1983;BINOTI et al, 2012;RETSLAFF et al, 2015). For this purpose, the nonlinear function usually known as Chapman-Richards was used [1], which belongs to the so called biological functions, for their demonstrated flexibility for studies related to growth phenomenon (RICHARDS, 1959;OSUMI, 1983;VANCLAY, 1994;MARTÍNEZ PASTUR et al, 1997;CHAUCHARD, 2001;CARRERO et al, 2008;IVANCICH et al, 2011;ATTIS BELTRÁN et al, 2015;DO AMARAL MACHADO et al, 2015;OLIVEIRA et al, 2015). Where h dom : dominant height; a: parameter related to the asymptote of the function; b: parameter related to the rate of change; c: parameter linked to the inflection point; Da: average DBH.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the following works all present height-diameter models for eucalyptus grown in Brazil using data from stands ages 8 years and younger: Ribeiro et al, 2010;Thiersch et al 2013;Miranda et al, 2014;Oliveira et al 2014;Mendonça et al, 2015;Souza et al, 2016. While there are some exceptions of studies dealing with older plantations (Azevedo et al, 2011;Oliveira et al, 2015) these are generally from small plantations that have not received active management operations (such as thinning or fertilization).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O erro padrão variou de ± 1,94 m a ± 2,09 m ou ± 9,71% a ± 10,29%, entres os níveis de intensidade amostral analisados, com o erro padrão residual médio de ± 2,00 m ou ± 9,98% (Tabela 4). Os erros obtidos são inferiores aos obtidos por Oliveira et al (2015) 3,5107 -6,2926 0,76 1,98 9,97 -4512 3237,55* * Em que: β0, β1, β2 = parâmetros dos modelos estimados; R²aj. = Coeficiente de determinação ajustado; Sy.x = Erro padrão residual em m; Sy.x % = Erro padrão residual em percentagem; AICc = Critério de informação de Akaike; F = Distribuição F; * = significativo ao nível de significância de 0,05.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified