2017
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20131406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelleting of diet for weaning pigs of different initial weights

Abstract: Physical form effect of the pre-starter diet supplied during the post-weaning period from 21 to 41 days of age on diet digestibility and animal performance in terms of zootechnical performances of light-weight (5.82kg) and heavy-weight weaning piglets (6.32kg) was evaluated, as well as the residual effects of the treatments until slaughter. Forty-eight female pigs at 21 days of age were evaluated. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 2x2 factorial scheme (meal/pelleted diet vs. light-weight/h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the period from 23 to 51 days, we observed that the processed diets (FP and CP) when compared to the diets (FM and CM) provided, on average, higher W51 (18.09 x 16.52 kg) and ADG (0.409 x 0.353 kg), respectively. Similarly, Surek et al (2017) found a significant effect of weight in up to 56 days (P<0.01), evidencing that the best productive performance attributed to the treatments submitted to pressure and heat conditions is in line with the benefits of pelleting (Wolf, Rust and Kamphues, 2010). On the other hand, there were no differences (P>0.05) for the ADFI and FCR variables.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the period from 23 to 51 days, we observed that the processed diets (FP and CP) when compared to the diets (FM and CM) provided, on average, higher W51 (18.09 x 16.52 kg) and ADG (0.409 x 0.353 kg), respectively. Similarly, Surek et al (2017) found a significant effect of weight in up to 56 days (P<0.01), evidencing that the best productive performance attributed to the treatments submitted to pressure and heat conditions is in line with the benefits of pelleting (Wolf, Rust and Kamphues, 2010). On the other hand, there were no differences (P>0.05) for the ADFI and FCR variables.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, the feed processing may have allowed greater exposure of the particles to the action of temperature and steam, making the nutrients more digestible and thus allowing better utilization by the piglets (Bao et al, 2016). However, for the W37, ADG and ADFI variables, no significant differences were observed (P>0.05) regarding the effect of the processing, differing from the results found by Surek et al (2017) in which pelletisation provided better ADG and FCR during the first week after weaning.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 83%