2018
DOI: 10.1590/0103-11042018s111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trabalho interprofissional e as Práticas Integrativas e Complementares no contexto da Atenção Primária à Saúde: potenciais e desafios

Abstract: RESUMO No campo da saúde no Brasil, o trabalho em equipe no contexto da Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS) se configura como estratégia para avançar na perspectiva do cuidado integral, bem como para ampliar a resolutividade nos demais níveis de atenção no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Este artigo objetivou analisar os potenciais e desafios do trabalho interprofissional com as Práticas Integrativas e Complementares (PIC) no contexto da APS. Estudo de abordagem qualitativa, efetuado no período de setembro de 2014 a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
37

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
37
Order By: Relevance
“…The limits in the training of participants of this study result in difficulties in the daily context of their practices. In a convergent way, studies (15)(16)(17)(18) reveal the lack of interprofessional performance among professionals in Basic Care services, precisely because of the difficulty of collaboration and interaction between the different nuclei of knowledge and practices, a constant challenge for health professionals. These studies question how insufficient are the guidelines on the performance of Nasf-AB professionals in daily life, whether in individual or collective clinical care, or technical and pedagogical support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limits in the training of participants of this study result in difficulties in the daily context of their practices. In a convergent way, studies (15)(16)(17)(18) reveal the lack of interprofessional performance among professionals in Basic Care services, precisely because of the difficulty of collaboration and interaction between the different nuclei of knowledge and practices, a constant challenge for health professionals. These studies question how insufficient are the guidelines on the performance of Nasf-AB professionals in daily life, whether in individual or collective clinical care, or technical and pedagogical support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sixth dialogic principle was contextualized in the studies (4,10,12,14,15,16,18,20,22,24,25,28,29,30,26,37,38,41,43,45,49,50,51,52, 53 and 54) at the level of ideas, situations, environments or characteristics that, although antagonistic, had interdependence and even mutually exclusive, are complementary. Unlike the dialectic word, which implies contradiction of principles or phenomena, which, through the dialectical method, make the difficulties disappear, the dialogical principle, on the contrary, is the elimination of the difficulty of combat among antagonists, since antagonists are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, we discuss the importance of collaborative and interprofessional practices in health education and practice, with a view to meeting local health needs. 24,25 Regarding the order/disorder/organization theme, the studies 1, 4, 7, 20, 22, 30, 37, 40, 51 and 54 highlighted this concept by mentioning that the universe is the result of the phenomena of order and disorder in search of systemic self-organization. It is noteworthy that the complexity of the relationship of this triad arises, therefore, when it appears that disordered phenomena are necessary, in certain cases, for the production of organized phenomena, which contribute to the growth of order; thus, organizations need order and disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result confirms the reflections presented in another study that discussed the potentials and challenges of interprofessional work with ICP in PHC. 37 This relationship reinforces an institutional culture rooted in the biomedical model, in which addressing the treatment and care of diseases limits other health promotion actions. 21 It is considered urgent to blur this limited view, as a recent experiment to expand ICP to the FHS has shown itself promising in the sense of motivating hybrid practitioners (practitioners of biomedicine and ICP) to be instructors of other colleagues 34 .…”
Section: Integrative and Complementary Practicesmentioning
confidence: 91%