2016
DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2016.v39n4.jt
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Passage and the 'no alternate possibilities' argument

Abstract: Dynamic theories of time typically commit to the claim that "time passes". In this paper I develop a version of the 'no alternate possibilities' argument in order to show that time does not pass, but that this is no threat to dynamic theories of time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, time cannot pass and hence does not pass. Tallant (2016) calls this the No Alternate Possibilities argument.…”
Section: Troublesome Rates Of Passagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, time cannot pass and hence does not pass. Tallant (2016) calls this the No Alternate Possibilities argument.…”
Section: Troublesome Rates Of Passagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary discussion of the No Alternate Possibilities argument (in particular Tallant 2016 and Raven [2011]) centres on the question of whether there is anything objectionable about a putative rate holding of necessity. It is taken for granted that there are, indeed, no alternate possibilities—no alternate rates at which time could pass.…”
Section: Troublesome Rates Of Passagementioning
confidence: 99%