Common bean grain yield as affected by sulfur fertilization and cultivars

Nascente, Adriano Stephan; Stone, L. F.; Melo, L. C.

doi:10.1590/0034-737x201764050013

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the likelihood of a positive response of grain crops to S fertilization has increased in various ecosystems around the world (Rheinheimer et al, 2005;Ercoli et al, 2011;Blum et al, 2013;Divito et al, 2015;Salvagiotti et al, 2017) as a consequence of (a) higher crop yield potential increasing S plant requirements (Salvagiotti et al, 2017), (b) the repeated use of phosphate and nitrogen fertilizers containing little or no S (Rheinheimer et al, 2005;Osório Filho et al, 2007), (c) reduced S atmospheric deposition (Divito et al, 2015;Vieira-Filho et al, 2015), (d) increased use of monocultures or crop successions, resulting in low inputs of crop residues, and (e) chemical and/or physical constraints on deep-rooting under NT (Dalla Nora et al, 2017). Crop responses to S application in Brazilian NT soils are highly variable and range from substantial increases (Miranda and Miranda, 2008;Fiorini et al, 2016;Pereira et al, 2016;Lopes et al, 2017;Nascente et al, 2017) to slight reductions in grain yield (Barbosa Filho et al, 2005;Megda et al, 2009;Gelain et al, 2011;Rampim et al, 2011) depending on the particular crop, soil, and climate conditions. Therefore, further consideration of these key drivers (viz., climate, soil chemical properties, crop type, and grain yield potential) for crop yield is imperative if management of S fertilization in Brazil is to be more sustainable.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crop Yield Responses to Sulfur Fertilization in Brazilian No-Till Soils: a Systematic Review

Pias

Tiecher

Cherubin

et al. 2019

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sulfur (S) fertilization recommendations for grain crops in Brazil were formerly established from studies on crops with a low yield potential grown on soils under conventional tillage (CT). However, the subsequent adoption of no-tillage (NT) altered S dynamics in the soil, making it necessary to carefully evaluate the applicability of these S fertilizer recommendations. In addition, the emergence of modern high-yield-potential genotypes, the successive application of concentrated low-sulfur fertilizers, and reduction in S atmospheric deposition have raised the likelihood of positive responses of crops to S fertilization. Available literature reports contrasting crop responses to S fertilization in Brazilian soils, ranging from substantial gains to slight yield losses depending on the particular crop, soil, and climate. The primary aim of this study was to examine available data for crop grain responses to S application in NT soils in order to ascertain whether existing recommendations established for Brazilian CT soils also hold for NT soils. A systematic review of data from 35 scientific publications spanning 58 crop harvests revealed a positive yield response to S fertilization in 31 % of the crop harvests, with an average yield increase of 16 %. Crops on soils with available SO 4 2--S contents above the critical level (viz., 7.5 mg dm -3 ) exhibited no positive response to S fertilization in any crop harvest (n = 18). Dry edible bean and corn were the most responsive crops, and canola and wheat, the least. For the trials with positive crop responses, a fertilizer rate of 26 kg ha -1 S sufficed to obtain at least 95 % of the maximum possible yield. In general, the S fertilization recommendations previously established for CT soil proved effective with grain crops on NT soils as a result of the critical levels of soil available SO 4 2--S and the fact that the recommended S rates are similar to those found in this study considering trials conducted under NT conditions only. However, existing recommendations could be improved by using additional criteria for soils with available SO 4 2--S contents below the critical level since a positive response was observed in 22 % (n = 18) and 92 % (n = 12) of the crop harvests under a subtropical and a tropical climate, respectively. Our results suggest that S fertilization must be prioritized in NT soils with available SO 4 2--S contents below 7.5 mg dm -3 in the 0.00-0.20 m layer, especially in tropical climate zones. In addition, regional fertilizer recommendation guidelines should consider crop type and yield expectation in order to facilitate more sustainable S management and increased crop yields in Brazil.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crop Yield Responses to Sulfur Fertilization in Brazilian No-Till Soils: a Systematic Review

Pias

Tiecher

Cherubin

et al. 2019

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This demonstrates that this agronomic attribute can be influenced by the addition of top-dressing N differently among cultivars. The number of grains per pod was not influenced by N doses since this attribute has high genetic heritability, hence being little affected by the environment and crop management, such as N fertilization (Nascente et al 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response of early-cycle common bean cultivars with carioca, black and speckled grains to top-dressing nitrogen fertilization

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim was to evaluate the agronomic and qualitative attributes of early-cycle common bean cultivars with different grains types grains in response to top-dressing nitrogen (N) doses. The experiment was carried out using a randomized block design, in a split-plot scheme, with 4 replicates. The plots consisted of the cultivars IAC Nuance, IAC 1849 Polaco and IAC Veloz, with speckled, Carioca and black grains, respectively. The subplots were formed by N doses applied as top-dressing: 0 kg ha-1, 60 kg ha-1 (applied in the stage of third trifoliate leaf), 120 kg ha-1 (1/2 applied at third trifoliate leaf stage + 1/2 applied at the floral bud stage) and 180 kg ha-1 (1/3 applied at the first trifoliate leaf stage + 1/3 applied at the third trifoliate leaf stage + 1/3 applied at the floral bud stage). IAC Veloz stood out for grain yield, showing the highest grain yield in the lowest N doses, being classified as efficient to the use of N. The cultivars IAC Nuance and IAC 1849 Polaco reached maximum yields with 155 and 163 kg ha-1 of N. The IAC Nuance was the most responsive, increasing grain yield by up to 25.3% due to nitrogen fertilization. Increasing N doses applied as top-dressing increased the sieve yield and crude protein content of the common bean cultivars, with IAC Nuance standing out. The cultivars showed good grain quality, and IAC 1849 Polaco and IAC Veloz had the shortest cooking time and IAC Veloz also had the fastest hydration.

show abstract

“…Cross talks between sulfur (S) and Cu govern Cu transport (Courbet et al., 2019). The Cu‐extraction‐efficient crops Phaseolus vulgaris , Brassica juncea , Ricinus communis , Hordeum vulgare , Sorghum vulgare , and Solanum lycopersicum are indeed responsive to S fertilization (Ahmad et al., 1995; Barczak et al., 2019; Biddulph et al., 1956; Castañon et al., 2019; Eriksen et al., 2001; Glowacka et al., 2019; Nascente et al., 2017; Pandurangan et al., 2015; Rezende et al., 2018; Zuchi et al., 2015). High S requirements by Brassica spp.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phytoremediation of Cu‐contaminated vineyard soils in Brazil: A compendium of Brazilian pot studies

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vineyard soils can be contaminated by copper (Cu) due to successive applications of fungicides and organic fertilizers. Soil remediation can be addressed by altering soil properties or selecting efficient Cu‐extracting cover crops tolerant to Cu toxicity. Our objectives were to synthesize the Cu‐extracting efficiency by plant species tested in Brazil, classify them according to Cu resistance to toxicity, and assess the effect of soil properties on attenuating Cu toxicity. We retrieved results from 41 species and cultivars, totaling 565 observations. Freshly added Cu varied between 50 and 600 mg Cu kg−1 of soil across studies. The partition of Cu removal between the above‐ and below‐ground portions was scaled as a logistic variable to facilitate data synthesis. The data were analyzed using the Adaboost machine learning model. Model accuracy (predicted vs. actual values) reached R2 = 0.862 after relating species, cultivar, Cu addition, clay, SOM, pH, soil test P, and Cu as features to predict the logistic target variable. Tissue Cu concentration varied between 7 and 105 mg Cu kg−1 in the shoot and between 73 and 1340 mg Cu kg−1 in the roots. Among soil properties, organic matter and soil test Cu most influenced the accuracy of the model. Phaseolus vulgaris, Brassica juncea, Ricinus communis, Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum vulgare, Cajanus cajan, Solanum lycopersicum, and Crotolaria spectabilis were the most efficient Cu‐extracting cover crops, as shown by positive values of the logistic variable (shoot removal > root removal). Those Cu‐tolerant plants showed differential capacity to extract Cu in the long run.

show abstract

Common bean grain yield as affected by sulfur fertilization and cultivars

Cited by 8 publications

References 8 publications

Crop Yield Responses to Sulfur Fertilization in Brazilian No-Till Soils: a Systematic Review

Crop Yield Responses to Sulfur Fertilization in Brazilian No-Till Soils: a Systematic Review

Response of early-cycle common bean cultivars with carioca, black and speckled grains to top-dressing nitrogen fertilization

Phytoremediation of Cu‐contaminated vineyard soils in Brazil: A compendium of Brazilian pot studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About