The model professionalism in the implementation of the Nursing Process (1979-2004)

Benedet, Silvana Alves; Padilha, Maria Itayra; Gelbke, Francine Lima; Bellaguarda, Maria Lí­gia dos Reis

doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0226

Cited by 16 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…28 These practices were innovator at the time and gave a good visibility to the hospital and its maternity and consequently to the group of pregnant women that followed the same principles. 6,8,28 The educative practices give support to the individuals to engage in the self-care, by constructing a sum of actions to be carried out in a given time, by reaching the requirements of self-care through the use of methods of actions. 8 The Group of Pregnant Women and /or Pregnant Couple has the function of instrument the pregnant woman and her companion for an active participation in the moment of the birth and puerperium.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is an education, free and interdisciplinary environment developed as an extension project of the department of nursing of the UFSC in partnership with the maternity and professionals of the HU-UFSC. 5,6 In 2016, the group completed 20 years of uninterrupted existence, endorsing, thus, its importance and relevance for society and academic community. This historical landmark is justified, considering as an important transition phase in the coordination and organization of its activities, renewing the health professionals and teachers of the group.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Group of pregnant women and / or pregnant couples: a collective construction process (1996-2016)

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To understand how the process of construction of the Group of Pregnant Women and/or Pregnant Couples of the Federal University of Santa Catarina from 1996 to 2016 was established. Method: Qualitative research of a social historical nature, involving nine health professionals who participated in the group of pregnant women and/or pregnant couples in this period. The date of collection took place between February and May 2017. Data analysis was guided by Orem's Self-Care Theory and Bardin's content analysis technique. Results: The process of construction of the group of pregnant women had strong influence from the public health policies of the University Hospital Maternity and its assistance of the time. Likewise, it was created based on the need for guidance to pregnant women and their companions to deal with the pregnancy-puerperal process with the perspective of a multidisciplinary and integral work, stimulating self-knowledge and self-care. Conclusion: The group emerged as an extension project and strengthened by public health policies, its scientific evidences and by the assistance philosophy of a maternity school. The group building process involved a set of actions, planning and execution of activities, building an educational space, free of charge, with an exchange of mutual experience and open to the community.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group of pregnant women and / or pregnant couples: a collective construction process (1996-2016)

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Its operationalization occurs through the Nursing Process (NP). NP is considered as the main theoretical-methodological model that directs nurses' actions in their professional practice to identify health / disease situations, establish nursing measures that contribute to health promotion, besides disease prevention and health recovery of the individual, family, and community (6)(7)(8)(9) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first stage of NP, investigation, is the identification of phenomena presented by the clientele, being pointed as a fundamental foundation for the Systematization of Nursing Care (SNC) development. The objectivity, reliability, and comprehensiveness of how data are collected in this process will influence care planning (8) , since they allow the identification of nursing diagnoses that will support a care plan (7) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Men’s health care: construction and validation of a tool for nursing consultation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: to elaborate and validate a data collection tool for nursing consultation with men in the context of Primary Health Care. Method: a methodological study developed in four stages. The first one consisted in tool elaboration, using databases and the Dorothea Orem’s theoretical model. In the second and third stages, content validation and tool appearance by 23 nurse judges took place. The Concordance Index was used for assessment. In the fourth stage, a pilot test was carried out with 20 men using Primary Health Care. Results: of the 145 indicators prepared, organized and submitted to validation process, items with the Concordance Index <0.80 were excluded. The final tool consisted of 156 items. An overall 0.88 Concordance Index calculation was obtained. Conclusions: the final tool presented content validity for data collection with men in Primary Health Care.

show abstract

“…As a significantly important part of clinical practice, the professional nursing process can be advanced in many ways[4]. Despite the fact that case reports are regarded to be of a lower quality grade in the hierarchy of evidence[5], one of the principles of evidence-based medicine is that decision-making should be based on a systematic summary of evidence[6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How about the reporting quality of case reports in nursing field?

Yang

Sun

et al. 2019

WJCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUNDAs a significantly important part of clinical practice, the professional nursing process can be advanced in many ways. Despite the fact that case reports are regarded to be of a lower quality grade in the hierarchy of evidence, one of the principles of evidence-based medicine is that decision-making should be based on a systematic summary of evidence. However, the evidence on the reporting characteristics of case reports in the nursing field is deficient.AIMTo use the CARE guidelines to assess reporting quality and factors influencing the quality of case reports in the nursing field.METHODSNursing science citation indexed (SCI-indexed) journals were identified from the professional website. Each of the identified journals was searched on their website for articles published before December 2017. Twenty-one sub-items on the CARE checklist were recorded as “YES”, “PARTLY”, or “NO” according to information reported by the included studies. The responses were assigned corresponding scores of 1, 0.5, and 0, respectively. The overall score was the sum of the 21 sub-items and was defined as “high” (more than 15), “medium” (10.5 to 14.5), and “low” (less than 10). The means, standard deviations, odds ratios (OR), and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined using Stata 12.0 software.RESULTSUltimately, 184 case reports from 16 SCI-indexed journals were identified, with overall scores ranging from 6.5 to 18 (mean = 13.6 ± 2.3). Of the included case reports, 10.3% were regarded low-quality, 52.7% were considered middle-quality, and 37% were regarded high-quality. There were statistical differences in the mean overall scores of the included case reports with funding versus those without funding (14.2 ± 1.7 vs 13.6 ± 2.4, respectively; P = 0.4456) and journal impact factor < 1.8 versus impact factor ≥ 1.8 (13.3 ± 2.3 vs 13.6 ± 2.4, respectively; P = 0.4977). Five items from the CARE guidelines, 5a (Patient), 6 (Clinical findings), 8c (Diagnostic reasoning), 9 (Therapeutic intervention), and 11d (The main take-away lessons) were well-reported (Reporting rate more than 90%) in most of the included case reports. However, only three items, 2 (Keywords, OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.19-0.92, P = 0.03), 4 (Introduction, OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.15-0.83, P = 0.017), and 11b (The relevant medical literature, OR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.06-0.56, P = 0.003) were considered better-reported after the CARE guidelines published in 2013.CONCLUSIONThe reporting quality of case reports in the nursing field apparently has not improved since the publication of the CARE guidelines.

show abstract

The model professionalism in the implementation of the Nursing Process (1979-2004)

Abstract: the introduction and implementation of the Nursing Process contributed to the progress of nursing in the state of Santa Catarina regarding appreciation and professionalization.

Cited by 16 publications

References 10 publications

Group of pregnant women and / or pregnant couples: a collective construction process (1996-2016)

Group of pregnant women and / or pregnant couples: a collective construction process (1996-2016)

Men’s health care: construction and validation of a tool for nursing consultation

How about the reporting quality of case reports in nursing field?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About