Translation and validation of Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese

Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy; Cedin, Luísa; Tavares-Preto, Jaqueline; Peixoto, Beatriz de Oliveira; Rostelato‐Ferreira, Sandro

doi:10.1016/j.rbre.2016.11.006

Cited by 11 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors stated that it is impossible to make a match between NBQ/pain locus of control and NDI [17]. Similarly to our results, also in the validity studies of the NBQ in other languages, it was found that there was a correlation at varying levels [6,20].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…In the study of Bolton and Humphreys, developers of the NBQ, they found Cronbach's a values of the survey to be 0.87, 0.91 and 0.92, respectively in pre-treatment, retest and post-treatment administration [5]. Pre-and post-treatment Cronbach's a values in the German version were 0.79 and 0.80 [17], respectively, whereas it was found to be 0.98 in the Brazilian Portuguese version [20]. In the Turkish version study of the NBQ, we found that the Cronbach's a value was 0.87, similarly to literature.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was seen that in the literature, different time intervals are preferred for the application of retest of the NBQ; and in some studies the time interval is not even specified. The test-retest time interval appears to be 2 h (hours) in the German version, 24 h in the French version and 1 h in the Brazilian Portuguese version [17,18,20]. It was determined that the original NBQ developed by Bolton and Humphreys had an ICC total score of 0.65 and that it changed between 0.50 and 0.63 for each questionnaire [5].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It includes 7 core items evaluating patients with neck pain based on a biopsychosocial approach. The NBQ was originally developed in English but studies have also been conducted on German, French, Italian, Dutch and Brazilian Portuguese language versions [5,6,[16][17][18][19][20]. The cultural adaptation of a self-report measurement in different languages is important for developing common strategies for evaluation and treatment [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain: a cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The cultural adaptation of a self-report measurement in different languages is important for developing common strategies for evaluation and treatment. The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ), which was developed to evaluate patients with neck pain, was adapted from the Bournemouth Questionnaire in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories. The aim of this study was to conduct the Turkish cultural adaptation, validity and reliability study of the NBQ. Material and methods: The study included 119 patients (93 females, 26 males; mean age: 37.2 ±11.8 years) with chronic nonspecific neck pain. The NBQ, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires were administered to all the subjects. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) and the internal consistency (Cronbach's a) were the methods used for the reliability study. The relationship between NBQ, NDI and NHP was investigated for concurrent validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used for construct validity. Results: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire showed good internal consistency (a = 0.87). The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.913 (95% CI: 0.875-0.940). The correlations between NBQ and NDI and NHP were significant (p < 0.05). The questionnaire was found to have one factor and the explained variance was 59.084% as a result of factor analysis. Conclusions: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is a valid and reliable scale for patients with chronic neck pain in the Turkish population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain: a cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[17][18][19] The neck pain version of the Bournemouth questionnaire has already been translated into Brazilian Portuguese. 20 However, the low back pain version has not been translated to…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: translation and cultural adaptation

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: The Bournemouth questionnaire is a multidimensional instrument for evaluating health domains among patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Bournemouth questionnaire for individuals with low back pain, to Brazilian Portuguese. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Federal University of São Carlos. METHODS: The Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire was developed following the processes of translation, back-translation, committee review and pre-testing. The translation phase involved two independent bilingual translators whose mother language was Brazilian Portuguese. The back-translation phase involved two independent translators whose mother language was English. In order to verify comprehension of the questionnaire, 44 individuals (43.1% men) with low back pain, and with mean age of 45.4 ± 13.8 years, participated in the pre-testing phase. RESULTS: During the translation phase, some terms and expressions were changed to obtain cultural equivalence to the original Bournemouth questionnaire. In the pre-testing phase, each item of the questionnaire showed a comprehension level of over 90%. CONCLUSION: The Bournemouth questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted to the Portuguese language, to be used among individuals with low back pain.

show abstract

Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Translation and validation of Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese

Abstract: Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted to Portuguese language, and it demonstrated to be valid and reliable to evaluate patients' neck pain.

Cited by 11 publications

References 20 publications

The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain: a cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study

The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain: a cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study

The Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: translation and cultural adaptation

Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About