The Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: translation and cultural adaptation

Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy; Fonseca, Carlos Luques; Calixtre, Letícia Bojikian

doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0482120419

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The process of initial validity is usually published as the basis for future studies that focus on the analysis of psychometric properties. In this sense, the methods and objectives of our study are similar to the investigations conducted by Kamonseki, Fonseca and Calixtre 16 , Donat et al 17 , and De Bortoli et al 18 . Our study and these investigations [16][17][18] were mainly based on the classics publications of Beaton et al 12 and Prinsen et al 13 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain: face and content validity

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our study aimed to perform the face and content validity of Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain (SEFIP) for workers, here called the SEFIP-work questionnaire. This is a questionnaire validity study. Our group previously translated and adapted the original version of the SEFIP, which was developed to investigate musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction to be applied to dancers (SEFIP-dance). However, due to the broad scope of the SEFIP-dance, we made changes and adaptations in the Brazilian Portuguese version of the SEFIP-dance to allow its use in workers. Therefore, face and content validity were performed for the development of the SEFIP-work based on opinions of committee of occupational disease and rehabilitation experts. After face and content validity, this SEFIP-work version was applied to 30 working individuals with musculoskeletal pain. The participants were native Brazilian Portuguese speakers aged 18 years and older. Thus, three changes were made to the questionnaire. All participants understood the SEFIP-work items and alternatives. The average total SEFIP-work score was 6.59 (SD=3.66), with the item “parte inferior das costas” (lower back) being the most marked (n=28; 93.33%), with an average score of 1.18 (SD=0.73). In conclusion, the Brazilian Portuguese version of SEFIP-work presents an acceptable level of understanding by workers in the investigation of musculoskeletal pain or discomfort.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain: face and content validity

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The NBQ has been cross-culturally translated into several languages with good internal consistency and construct validity to evaluate low back pain and NP. 24 Recently, the version of this instrument has been translated and validated in various languages such as Arabic, 25 , 26 Brazilian, 27 Turkish, 28 , 29 French, 15 Dutch, 16 German, 12 and Italian. 17 The 6-step translation and cross cultural adaptation process after Beaton et al, 14 was used in this study and included forward and back translations, validation by an expert committee, face validity and testing in NP patients followed by statistical analysis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) is being used widely in various countries. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Persian version of NBQ. Methods: This methodological study investigated 170 patients with chronic neck pain (NP). The psychometric properties of NBQ were evaluated in two stages. First, the standard scale was translated based on Guillemin’s guidelines for cross-cultural adaption and face validity tested in a pilot group (N=25). Second, it was conducted on a sample of 170 diverse chronic pain patients. Construct validity was determined with convergent validity by short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Then, the reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: The instrument demonstrated a good face validity and the participants made minor changes. A slight change was applied on content validity. In construct validity, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.85, which was statistically significant and showed strong correlation. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87 was obtained. This confirmed the remarkable internal consistency and stability (0.92). Conclusion: The Persian version of NBQ showed a good internal consistency and reliability and it could be considered as a valuable tool for assessing patients with cervical pain in Iranian population.

show abstract

“…Performing only cross-cultural translation and adaptation is common in the scientific literature. 24 , 28 , 29 However, these procedures are only the first phase in properly ascertaining the validity of these questionnaires. Therefore, we recommend that further studies should be conducted to verify the psychometric properties of SEFIP-dance in Brazilian Portuguese and SEFIP-sport in Brazilian Portuguese and English.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brazilian version of the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for musculoskeletal injuries relating to dance and sport: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION Cross-cultural adaptations of questionnaires in developing countries, such as Brazil, have fostered a major debate involving the fields of economics, health, politics and culture. 1 Today, with the development and dissemination of the Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures 2 and of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN), 3 standardization of cross-cultural adaptation relating to culture, language and country is providing positive outcomes within scientific and clinical contexts. Within healthcare sciences, especially in the field of prevention and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries, it is common to use questionnaires to measure self-reported outcomes, mainly in relation to pain and functional disability. 4-6 Among the questionnaires for screening of musculoskeletal injuries, in addition to instruments that were created by researchers for specific evaluations, 7,8 the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) stands out through its widespread use for locating musculoskeletal pain in diverse populations. 9-12 However, the NMQ does not have a severity score, and it is not possible to use it to make inferences about functional disability. Therefore, as a way to fill this gap, the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain (SEFIP) questionnaire was developed and published in 1999. This is an instrument created based

show abstract

The Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: translation and cultural adaptation

Cited by 5 publications

References 31 publications

Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain: face and content validity

Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain: face and content validity

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

Brazilian version of the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for musculoskeletal injuries relating to dance and sport: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About