2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2016.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the finger-feeding versus cup feeding methods in the transition from gastric to oral feeding in preterm infants

Abstract: The finger-feeding technique was shown to be a better feeding transition method regarding efficacy when compared with cup feeding method, due to lower milk loss and fewer complication episodes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the length of hospital stay G1 had a higher median time when compared to G2 which is in agreement with the literature that stated the prolonged use of enteral tubes may require longer hospital stays until reaching favorable clinical conditions for discharge (10) . On the other hand, CGA at hospital discharge was similar in both groups, pointing out that, despite risk conditions at birth, when reaching CGA close to full-term birth (37 weeks) (25) , the population studied here presented adequate clinical and feeding conditions due to OD. Regarding to speech therapy intervention, in relation to the NBs who used or not using an enteral tube, it was higher in G1 than in G2, with a difference in the comparison between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Regarding the length of hospital stay G1 had a higher median time when compared to G2 which is in agreement with the literature that stated the prolonged use of enteral tubes may require longer hospital stays until reaching favorable clinical conditions for discharge (10) . On the other hand, CGA at hospital discharge was similar in both groups, pointing out that, despite risk conditions at birth, when reaching CGA close to full-term birth (37 weeks) (25) , the population studied here presented adequate clinical and feeding conditions due to OD. Regarding to speech therapy intervention, in relation to the NBs who used or not using an enteral tube, it was higher in G1 than in G2, with a difference in the comparison between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…A study with RNPTs from 32 to 34 weeks of GA that used the cup pointed out the presence of some complications, such as O 2 Sat drop, cyanosis, respiratory effort and choking. However, it could not be observed significant difference regarding the complications when comparing the finger and cup probe groups in PTNBs with GA of 34 + 1/36 + 6 (28) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In a recent study, authors (28) verified a similar weight gain between the probe-finger and cup groups, but perceived a greater diet escape in the cup group in PTNBs with GA between 32-34 weeks, confirming that the PTNBs using the probe-finger technique have better use of the diet (26) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Estudos mostram que a translactação é a técnica mais eficaz para favorecer a transição da alimentação alternativa por sonda gástrica para a via oral quando comparada a outros métodos, pois é o meio pelo qual o RNPT recebe estímulos orais fidedignos em virtude de ser exposto diretamente ao seio materno (SIQUEIRA; DIAS, 2011). Entretanto, não se pode ignorar que a perda de leite e a ingestão incompleta do volume total prescrito é uma situação que pode levar à perda de peso e influenciar o estado clínico de RNPT (MOREIRA et al, 2017).…”
Section: Translactação Versus Alimentação No Copo De Prematurosunclassified
“…Assim, transição alimentar da via gástrica para a via oral é um grande desafio, não só para o bebê prematuro, mas também para a equipe de saúde, pois é sua responsabilidade avaliar o melhor método de transição alimentar para cada recém-nascido, considerando que é um período que requer atenção em termos de segurança e eficiência na administração da dieta (MOREIRA et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified